Duwaine Reese v. K. Robinson et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Response to Order to Show Cause due within 20 days from the filing date of this Order. (ib)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. CV 15-05939 DMG (AFM)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
K. ROBINSON, et al.,
On March 9, 2017, defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Based
on Plaintiff’s Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies and Notice to Pro Se
Plaintiff Regarding Requirements for Opposing a Motion for Summary Judgment.
On March 10, 2017, the Court ordered plaintiff to serve and file his opposition to
the Motion for Summary Judgment no later than April 8, 2017. Additionally,
plaintiff was advised that failure to oppose a motion may be construed as consent to
the granting of the motion, and may result in dismissal of the action. Local Rule 7-
defendant’s Notice regarding requirements for opposing a motion for summary
The Court also directed plaintiff to review and follow the procedures in
On April 14, 2017, the Court received several mail parcels addressed to
plaintiff at his address of record and returned as undeliverable with the notation
“Return to Sender Inmate Paroled.” Previously, on April 28, 2016, plaintiff was
advised that the Court must immediately be notified of any address changes and
must provide the Court with the new address and its effective date. Plaintiff’s
failure to comply with a court order where plaintiff did not receive the order due to
failure to inform the court of plaintiff’s current address may result in the action
being dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-
41 (9th Cir. 1988); Local Civil Rule 41-6. (See Order re Civil Rights Case, ECF
The docket shows that, as late as the date of this Order, plaintiff has not filed
his opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment or filed a notice of change of
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that within 20 days from the filing date of
this Order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be
dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
admonished that if he fails to timely file a response, the Court will recommend that
this action be dismissed.
Further, plaintiff is
DATED: April 28, 2017
ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?