Howard L Baldwin et al v. United States of America
Filing
78
JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. See order for specifics. (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 HOWARD L. BALDWIN AND KAREN
12
Plaintiffs,
13
JUDGMENT
v.
14
15
Case No. 2:15-cv-06004 RGK (AGRx)
BALDWIN,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
16
17
18
This action came under consideration before the Court as a bench trial on
19 November 22, 2016. The Court after having considered all relevant evidence and
20 argument of counsel issued its Opinion and Order re Bench Trial on December 2,
21 2016, finding that Plaintiffs Howard and Karen Baldwin are the prevailing parties in
22 this action.
23
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered in favor
24 of Plaintiffs Howard and Karen Baldwin and against Defendant United States of
25 America in the amount of $167,663 as a refund of taxes paid for the federal income
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
CHAMBERLIN & KEASTER LLP
1000-054/[P]JUDGMENT -120616
1
CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-06004 RGK (AGRX)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1 tax period ending December 31, 2005, plus statutory interest accruing on this amount
2 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. ยงยง 6611, 6621 and 6622.
3
4
Date:
December 7, 2016
5
6
7
8
______________________________________
R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CHAMBERLIN & KEASTER LLP
1000-054/[P]JUDGMENT -120616
2
CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-06004 RGK (AGRX)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?