Tina Oh v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc, et al

Filing 19

ORDER RE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIREACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A) by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled action, is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear her/its own respective attorneys' fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no further proceedings shall take place in this action.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (rfi)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TINA OH,

11
12
13
14
15

Case No. 2:15-cv-06297 BRO (JCx)
Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PARTIES’ JOINT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE
ACTION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(A)

v.
LUXOTTICA RETAIL NORTH
AMERICA INC., and DOES 1 through
50, Inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2.

1

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled action, Oh v. Luxottica Retail

3

North America Inc, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. 2:15-cv-06297 BRO

4

(JCx), is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear her/its own respective

5

attorneys’ fees and costs. All pending proceedings are vacated and no further

6

proceedings shall take place in this action.

7
8
9
10
11

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
Dated: March 3, 2016
HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3.