Elias Munoz v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re Stipulation for Protective Order 30 . (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Rebecca Licht Jensen, Bar No. 267752
rjensen@morganlewis.com
300 South Grand Avenue
Twenty-Second Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132
Tel: +1.213.612.2500
Fax: +1.213.612.2501
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Ross H. Friedman (admitted pro hac vice)
rfriedman@morganlewis.com
Emily A. Glunz (admitted pro hac vice)
eglunz@morganlewis.com
Kevin F. Gaffney (admitted pro hac vice)
kgaffney@morganlewis.com
77 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5094
Tel: +1.312.324.1000
Fax: +1.312.324.1001
Attorneys for Defendants
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK
WEIDMANN & FARRAR P.C.
Mark Weidmann, Bar No. 157670
mweidmann@weidmannlaw.com
Kim Farrar, Bar No. 108357
kfarrar@weidmannlaw.com
1875 Century Park East, Suite 1850
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: +1.310.201.9699
Fax: +1.310.201.9698
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELIAS MUNOZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 2:15-cv-6309-DMG-JEM
ELIAS MUNOZ,
Plaintiff,
PROTECTIVE ORDER
vs.
NATIONAL RAILROAD
PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a
AMTRAK, and DOES 1 to 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiff Elias Munoz (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant National Railroad
Passenger Corporation d/b/a/ Amtrak (“Defendant”) (the “Parties”), through their
respective counsel, hereby stipulate for an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)
that confidential information be disclosed only in the following designated ways:
1.
A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Discovery in this Action is likely to involve production of confidential,
proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may
be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to
enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this
Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to
discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends
only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment
under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth
in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to
file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the
procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a
party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.
B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
This Action is likely to involve proprietary information for which special
protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than
prosecution of this Action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials
and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial
information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other
confidential research, development, or commercial information (including
information implicating privacy rights of third parties), personal identity
information, personnel or employment records of a person who is not the plaintiff
in this case, personal health information of a person who is not a plaintiff in this
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
2
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
case, and/or other information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or
which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or
federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to
expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over
confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties
are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable
necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to
address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a
protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the
parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons
and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been
maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it
should not be part of the public record of this case.
2.
DEFINITIONS
2.1
Action: This pending federal law suit, Elias Munoz v. National
Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-6309DMG-JEM pending in the United States District Court, Central District of
California.
2.2
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the
designation of information or items under this Order.
2.3
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of
how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for
protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in
the Good Cause Statement.
2.4
Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as
their support staff).
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
3
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
2.5
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or
items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as
“CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.6
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless
of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,
among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced
or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
2.7
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter
pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as
an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.
2.8
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.
House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside
counsel.
2.9
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association,
or other legal entity not named as a Party to this Action.
2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a
party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and
have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm
which has appeared on behalf of that party and includes support staff.
2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,
employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their
support staffs).
2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
Discovery Material in this Action.
2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation
support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)
and their employees and subcontractors.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
4
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery
Material from a Producing Party.
3.
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only
Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or
extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or
compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or
presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the
trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.
4.
DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations
imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees
otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be
deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action,
with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and
exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action,
including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time
pursuant to applicable law.
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.
Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under
this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that
qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for
protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written
communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents,
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
5
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept
unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations
that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper
purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or
to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the
Designating Party to sanctions.
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it
designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must
promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in
this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise
stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection
under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or
produced.
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
a.
for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic
documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial
proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum the legend
“CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter, “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that
contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page
qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected
portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated
which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and
before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be
deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
6
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine
which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then,
before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the
“CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a
portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing
Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making
appropriate markings in the margins).
b.
(b)
for testimony given in depositions that the Designating
Party identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close
of the deposition all protected testimony.
c.
(c)
for information produced in some form other than
documentary and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a
prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the
information is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions
of the information warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent
practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
5.3
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent
failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive
the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such
material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make
reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the
provisions of this Order.
6.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s
Scheduling Order.
6.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the
dispute resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
87
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
6.3
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on
the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper
purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other
parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating
Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall
continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is
entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the
challenge.
7.
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is
disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this
Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such
Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the
conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a
Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL
DISPOSITION).
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons
authorized under this Order.
7.2
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless
otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a
Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
a.
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action,
as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably
necessary to disclose the information for this Action;
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
8
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
b.
the officers, directors, and employees (including House
Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this
Action;
c.
Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to
whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
d.
the court and its personnel;
e.
court reporters and their staff;
f.
professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action
and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit
A);
g.
the author or recipient of a document containing the information
or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
h.
during their depositions, witnesses ,and attorneys for witnesses,
in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the
deposing party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit A hereto;
and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they
sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless
otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of
transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected
Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to
anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and
i.
any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting
personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement
discussions.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
9
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
8.
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED
IN OTHER LITIGATION
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation
that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
a.
promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such
notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
b.
promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or
order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include
a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
c.
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be
pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with
the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this
Action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the
subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s
permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking
protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions
should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action
to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE
PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION
a.
The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced
by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such
information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected
by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions
should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
10
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
b.
In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery
request, to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the
Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s
confidential information, then the Party shall:
(1)
promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the
Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a
confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;
(2)
promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the
Stipulated Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a
reasonably specific description of the information requested; and
(3)
make the information requested available for inspection
by the Non-Party, if requested.
c.
If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from
this court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the
Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive
to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the
Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that
is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a
determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party
shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected
Material.
10.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this
Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in
writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best
efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the
person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
11
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment
and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
PROTECTED MATERIAL
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain
inadvertently, unintentionally, or mistakenly produced material is subject to a claim
of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those
set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B), including but not limited
to promptly returning all copies of documents containing the privileged
information, deleting any versions of the documents containing the privileged
information on any database or computer filing system it maintains, and making no
use of the privileged information. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d),
neither the attorney-client privilege nor the work product protection is waived by
production in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Agreement
shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of
Evidence 502(d). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may
be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior
privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as
the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or
information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the
parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted
to the court.
12.
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any
person to seek its modification by the court in the future.
12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to
disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
12
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on
any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective
Order.
12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material
may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material
under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information
in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court.
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60
days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must
return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As
used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,
compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the
Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the
Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if
not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that
(1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was
returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any
copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or
capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel
are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial,
deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition
and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert
work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival
copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective
Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
13
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
14.
Any violation of this order may be punished by any and all appropriate
measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary
sanctions.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: January 26, 2016
WEIDMANN & FARRAR P.C.
By /s/ Mark Weidmann
Mark Weidmann
Kim Farrar
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELIAS MUNOZ
Dated: February 2, 2016
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By /s/ Emily A. Glunz
Emily A. Glunz
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONAL RAILROAD
PASSENGER CORPORATION
d/b/a AMTRAK
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 2, 2016
HON. JOHN E. McDERMOTT
United States Magistrate Judge
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
14
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of
____________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of
perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective
Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of
California on ________________ in the case of Elias Munoz v. National Railroad
Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-6309-DMG-JEM. I
agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective
Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me
to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I
will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this
Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with
the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the
United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of
enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even is such enforcement
proceedings occur after termination of this actions. I hereby appoint
________________ [print or type full name] of ______________________ [print
or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of
process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of
this Stipulated Protective Order.
Date:
City and State where sworn and signed:
Printed name:
Signature:
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
DB1/ 84609527.3
15
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-6309-DMG-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?