Jaime Membreno et al v. Fu Wei et al

Filing 37

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION #30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On November 4, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiffs Jaime Membreno and Nabb I-Am to file a First Amended Complaint on or before November 26, 2015. (ECF No. 29.) On November 30, 2015, Plaintiffs Jaime Membreno and Nabb I-Am filed an ex parte application seeking an extension of time in which to file their First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 30.) The next day, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 33.) The Court hereby accepts plaintiffs First Amended Complaint for docketing purposes, and GRANTS Plaintiffs ex parte application to that extent. However, the Court expresses no opinion at this point on the merits of the claims asserted in the First Amended Complaint, including whether or not the filing complies with the Courts prior orders. Defendants response to the First Amended Complaint is due fourteen days from the date of this Order. (lc). Modified on 12/14/2015. (lc).

O

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

JAIME MEMBRENO; and NABB I-AM,

Case № 2:15-cv-06322-ODW (RAOx)

Plaintiffs,

12

v.

13

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

14

FU WEI; HA HUYNH; FU WEI & HA

PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE

15

HUYNH FAMILY LIVING TRUST;

APPLICATION [30]

16

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE; SAM S.

17

LESLIE; 360 CONCEPTS PROPERTY

18

MANAGEMENT; WILL ALLEN; A & A

19

ESCROW SERVICES; and DIMITROW

20

TAMAR,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26

///

27

///

28

///

1

On November 4, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiffs Jaime Membreno and Nabb

2

I-Am to file a First Amended Complaint on or before November 26, 2015. (ECF No.

3

29.) On November 30, 2015, Plaintiffs Jaime Membreno and Nabb I-Am filed an ex

4

parte application seeking an extension of time in which to file their First Amended

5

Complaint.

6

Complaint. (ECF No. 33.) The Court hereby accepts Plaintiffs’ First Amended

7

Complaint for docketing purposes, and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ ex parte application to

8

that extent. However, the Court expresses no opinion at this point on the merits of the

9

claims asserted in the First Amended Complaint, including whether or not the filing

10
11
12

(ECF No. 30.)

The next day, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended

complies with the Court’s prior orders.
Defendants’ response to the First Amended Complaint is due fourteen days
from the date of this Order.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

December 14, 2015

16
17
18

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2