Beachbody LLC et al v. AAF Freight LA Corp. et al
Filing
76
PERMANENT INJUNCTION against defendants AAE LAX Inc, AAF Frieght LA Corp, GELS Logistics Inc, Xindi John Hu, Tom T Lu, Benson Wai, Juan Xu and Dismissal of Entire Action by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that Defendants, including any and all officers, di rectors, members, agents, servants, employees, partners, corporation, limited liability company, parent company, subsidiary, affiliates, successors, assignees, and any others over which Defendants may exercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined. FURTHER ORDERED that upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants, this case shall be dismissed by the Court in its entirety with the Parties bearing their own attorney fees and costs. (Case CLOSED). (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
BEACHBODY, LLC, et al.,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
Case No.: 2:15-cv-06452 FMO (PLAx)
v.
18
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AGAINST DEFENDANTS AAF
FREIGHT (LA) CORP., GELS
LOGISTICS, INC., ALL ACCESS
EXPRESS, INC., AAE LAX, INC.,
BENSON WAI, XINDI “JOHN” HU,
TOM T. LU, AND JUAN XU AND
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
19
Honorable Fernando M. Olguin
16
17
AAF FREIGHT (LA) CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court, pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Permanent Injunction and
Dismissal of Entire Action (the “Stipulation”), by and between Plaintiffs
Beachbody, LLC (“Beachbody”) and Bose Corporation (“Bose”) (collectively,
“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants AAF Freight (LA) Corp., GELS Logistics, Inc., All
Access Express, Inc., AAE Lax, Inc., Benson Wai, Xindi “John” Hu, Tom T. Lu,
and Juan Xu (collectively, “Defendants”), filed concurrently herewith, hereby
-1-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
ORDERS that a Permanent Injunction shall be and hereby is entered against
2
Defendants in the above-referenced matter as follows:
3
I.
PERMANENT INJUNCTION. IT IS HEREBTY ORDERED that
4
Defendants, including any and all officers, directors, members, agents, servants,
5
employees, partners, corporation, limited liability company, parent company,
6
subsidiary, affiliates, successors, assignees, and any others over which Defendants
7
may exercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined, pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
8
§1116(a) and 17 U.S.C. §501, from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or
9
authorizing or assisting any third party to engage in, any of the following activities
10
in the United States: copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, purchasing,
11
marketing, advertising, offering for sale, selling, receiving, storing, packaging,
12
fulfilling, distributing or dealing in any product or service that uses, or otherwise
13
making any use of, any of Plaintiffs’ intellectual properties, including but not
14
limited to, the BEACHBODY® (Reg. Nos. 2665151, 2853244, 2862904, and
15
2873866), FOCUS T25® (Reg. Nos. 4404411 and 4412310), PIYO® (Reg. Nos.
16
4549501 and 4629995), P90X® (Reg. Nos. 3444723 and 3669400), P90X3® (Reg.
17
No. 4503107), INSANITY® (Reg. Nos. 3696777 and 4049382), 21 DAY FIX®
18
(Reg. Nos. 4506354 and 4580177), and CIZE® (Reg. No. 4860840) word and
19
design marks, the BOSE® (Reg. Nos. 0829402 and 3863254), BETTER SOUND
20
THROUGH RESEARCH® (Reg. No. 1767324), Engineered for Exercise® (Reg.
21
No. 4262660), TRIPORT® (Reg. No. 3060458), STAYHEAR® (Reg. No.
22
3878139), interwoven white and black cord design mark (Reg. No. 3497786), and
23
contrasting two color swirl pattern cord design mark (Reg. No. 4370745) word and
24
design marks, and/or Beachbody’s copyrights in its FOCUS T25 KIT (Reg. No.
25
PA0001935094), PIYO KIT (2014) (Reg. No. PA0001929038), P90X3 Kit (2013)
26
(Reg. No. PA0001902813), INSANITY MAX:30 (Reg. No. PA0001961905), 21
27
DAY FIX KIT (2014) (Reg. No. PA0001890353), and CIZE KIT (2015) (Reg. No.
28
PA0001979283) exercise kits and DVDs (collectively hereinafter “Plaintiffs’
-2-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
Intellectual Properties”).
II.
2
FORFEITURE OF CURRENT INVENTORY. IT IS FURTHER
3
ORDERED that Defendants, including any and all officers, directors, members,
4
agents, servants, employees, partners, corporation, limited liability company,
5
parent company, subsidiary, affiliates, successors, assignees, and any others over
6
which Defendants may exercise control, shall forfeit and deliver to Plaintiffs any
7
products in Defendants’ possession, custody, or control bearing or embodying
8
Plaintiffs’ Intellectual Properties.
9
include any accused exercise kits and DVDs and/or headphones currently in
10
Defendants’ possession, custody, or control or and any items which come into
11
Defendants’ possession after the effective date of this Permanent Injunction.
III.
12
The items affected by this paragraph shall
ENTRY OF THIS PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
IT IS
13
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court finds there is no just reason for delay in
14
entering this Permanent Injunction against Defendants, and, the Court directs
15
immediate entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants. This Permanent
16
Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendants at the time of its
17
execution by the Court.
IV.
18
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION.
IT IS FURTHER
19
ORDERED that upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendants, this
20
case shall be dismissed by the Court in its entirety with the Parties bearing their
21
own attorney’s fees and costs.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
-3-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
V.
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
2
that this Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce any
3
violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction by Defendants.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2016.
6
7
8
9
__________________/s/_________________
HON. FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
District Court Judge of the United States
Central District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?