Luis A. Marquez v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 30

MINUTES OF DEFENDANT US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DKT. 8) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. 15) STATUS CONFERENCE RE SETTLEMENT (DKT. 26) held before Judge John A . Kronstadt: The status conference is held. The Court has reviewed the parties' respective reports on the status of the loan modification. Dkt. 28, 29. Counsel report that nothing further has occurred since the filing of their status reports. T he Court directs the parties to meet and confer regarding the status of the loan modification and file a joint status report by January 19, 2016. The motion hearing is held. The Court states its tentative views that it is inclined to deny Plaintiff&# 039;s Motion to Remand to the California Superior Court (the "Plaintiff's Motion") and grant in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (the "Defendant's Motion"). Counsel address the Court. The Court takes the Plaintiff's Motion and Defendant's Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and an order will be issued.Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (bp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

LA CV15-06658 JAK (Ex)

Title

Luis A. Marquez v. U.S. Bank, N.A., et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

January 11, 2016

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Andrea Keifer

Alex Joko

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Stuart R. Simone

James C. Magid

Proceedings:

DEFENDANT US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DKT. 8)
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND TO CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT
(DKT. 15)
STATUS CONFERENCE RE SETTLEMENT (DKT. 26)

The status conference is held. The Court has reviewed the parties’ respective reports on the status of the
loan modification. Dkt. 28, 29. Counsel report that nothing further has occurred since the filing of their
status reports. The Court directs the parties to meet and confer regarding the status of the loan
modification and file a joint status report by January 19, 2016.
The motion hearing is held. The Court states its tentative views that it is inclined to deny Plaintiff’s Motion
to Remand to the California Superior Court (the “Plaintiff’s Motion”) and grant in part Defendant’s Motion
to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “Defendant’s Motion”). Counsel address the Court. The Court takes
the Plaintiff’s Motion and Defendant’s Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and an order will be issued.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:
Initials of Preparer

34

ak

Page 1 of 1