Gold Value International Textile, Inc. v. Gypsy 05, Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Having reviewed the concurrently filed Stipulation for Dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Gold Value International Textile, Inc.'s Complaint in this action is dismissed in i ts entirety with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for all purposes, including the dismissal of this case, each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the parties' settlement agreement and payment of all amounts due thereunder. re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 32 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (sbou)

JS-6

MICHAEL E. PAPPAS (SBN 130400)
[e-mail]
DAVID S. ALVERSON (SBN 198885)
[e-mail]
LESNICK PRINCE & PAPPAS LLP
315 W. Ninth Street, Suite 705
Los Angeles, California 90015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Gold Value International
Textile, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GOLD VALUE INTERNATIONAL
TEXTILE, INC., a California
Corporation, individually and doing
business as “FIESTA FABRIC,”

Case No. 2:15-cv-06928-PJW
ORDER RE DISMISSAL

Plaintiff,
v.
GYPSY 05, INC., a California
Corporation; THE TJX COMPANIES,
INC., a Delaware Corporation,
individually and doing business as
“Marshalls”; EMINENT, INC., a
Delaware Corporation, individually and
doing business as “Revolve Clothing”
and “www.revolveclothing.com”;
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PROOF OF SERVICE

ORDER
Having reviewed the concurrently filed Stipulation for Dismissal,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Gold Value International Textile,
Inc.’s Complaint in this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for all purposes, including the dismissal
of this case, each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The Court
retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement and
payment of all amounts due thereunder.

Dated: December 9, 2016

_____________________________
Patrick J. Walsh
United States Magistrate Judge