Mary M Mouring v. HP Financial, LLC et al

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Plaintiff has taken no further action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no late r than October 25, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice without further warning from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)

1

O

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

United States District Court
Central District of California

9
10
11
12

MARY M. MOURING,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

Case No. 2:15-CV-06962-ODW(JPR)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v.
HP FINANCIAL, LLC, and DOES 1–10,

THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE

inclusive,

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
Defendants.

17

PROSECUTION

18
19
20
21

On September 3, 2015, Plaintiff Mary M. Mouring filed a complaint alleging

22

that Defendant HP Financial, LLC, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and

23

the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. (Compl. ¶1, ECF No. 1.) However,

24

Defendants never filed an answer. Plaintiff has taken no further action to prosecute

25

this case.

26

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no

27

later than October 25, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without

28

prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely

1

written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without

2

prejudice without further warning from the Court.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

October 11, 2016

6
7
8

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2