Kevin William King v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 177

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/17/2018. Plaintiff is hereby cautioned that failing to comply with this Order and/or to show cause, will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (See document for details). (ib)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. CV 15-07072 SVW (AFM)
Title

Date: January 3, 2018

Kevin W. King v. County of Los Angeles, et al.

Present: The Honorable:

ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Ilene Bernal
Deputy Clerk

N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
N/A

Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause

On November 15, 2017, the District Judge (1) accepted and adopted the Second
Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; (2) granted defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint; (3) dismissed without further leave to amend and
with prejudice (a) plaintiff’s claims against all defendants arising from, or concerning, the
incident on May 16, 2014, and (b) all of plaintiff’s claims against individual defendants
Sergeant Castro, Lieutenant Trejo, Deputy Mercado, Deputy Neri, and Sergeant Klinski; (4)
dismissed with leave to amend plaintiff’s claims against the County only pertaining to the
conditions of plaintiff’s confinement in the Disciplinary Segregation Unit; (5) ordered
plaintiff, if he desires to pursue his claim against the County only pertaining to the conditions
of plaintiff’s confinement in the Disciplinary Segregation Unit, to file and serve a Fourth
Amended Complaint ─ limited to that claim and that defendant ─ no later than thirty (30)
days from the date of the Order; and (6) directed plaintiff not to re-allege in a Fourth
Amended Complaint the factual allegations concerning the incident on May 16, 2014 or
claims against the individual defendants who were dismissed in the Order.
The docket indicates that plaintiff has not filed a Fourth Amended Complaint.
Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for
failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall file and serve a response to this Order in a written
submission on or before January 17, 2018. Plaintiff is hereby cautioned that failing to
comply with this Order and/or to show cause, will result in the recommendation that this
action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (03/15)

Civil Minutes – General

:
ib

Page 1 of 1