Reynaldo Lopez et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc et al

Filing 11

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order 9 . (mr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 REYNALDO LOPEZ, an individual; EUNICE DELGADILLO, an individual; UMBERTO MENDOZA, an individual; and AVEIA TAUTOLO, an individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a Georgia corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW (SSx) PROTECTIVE ORDER [Discovery Document: Referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery in this action is likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from 4 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 5 may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the 6 Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge 7 that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 8 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 9 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 10 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 11 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 12 file confidential information under seal; the Central District of California’s Local 13 Rules, including Civil Local Rule 79-5, sets forth the procedures that must be 14 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from 15 the Court to file material under seal. 16 A. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 17 This action is likely to involve proprietary business and confidential 18 employee information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 19 use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. 20 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, 21 among other things, confidential business, commercial or financial information 22 (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), private 23 information of Defendant’s current and former employees who are not parties to 24 this action (including information of these third parties regarding their health, 25 medical, and/or disability status, information regarding their leaves of absence from 26 employment, payroll records, employees’ private financial information (including 27 private bank account numbers, W-2, and payroll information), and/or information 28 regarding their separation from employment), that is otherwise generally MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES 1 PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 2 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common 3 law, and medical, personnel and/or financial information regarding the Plaintiffs, 4 including such information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which 5 may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal 6 statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 7 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 8 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 9 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 10 parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 11 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 12 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 13 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 14 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 15 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and 16 there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 17 2. DEFINITIONS 18 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit. 19 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 20 21 designation of information or items under this Protective Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 22 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 23 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), as specified above in the 24 Good Cause Statement, and including, but not limited to, the names and contact 25 information for putative class members. 26 27 2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 2 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 2 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 3 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 4 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 5 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 6 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 7 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 8 9 10 11 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 12 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 13 counsel. 14 15 16 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 17 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 18 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 19 which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 20 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 21 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 22 support staffs). 23 24 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 25 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 26 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 27 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 28 and their employees and subcontractors. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 3 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 1 2 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 3 4 Material from a Producing Party. 5 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Protective Order cover not 6 7 only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 8 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 9 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any deposition testimony, 10 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal 11 Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and 12 Protective Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is 13 in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part 14 of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 15 publication not involving a violation of this Protective Order, including becoming 16 part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known 17 to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party 18 after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under 19 no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. 20 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate 21 agreement or order of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of 22 Protected Material at trial. 23 4. 24 DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 25 imposed by this Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party 26 agrees otherwise in writing or a Court order otherwise directs. Final disposition 27 shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this 28 Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 4 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of 2 this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for 3 extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 4 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 6 Each Party or Non-Party who or which designates information or items for 7 protection under this Protective Order must take care to limit any such designation 8 to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating 9 Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, 10 or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, 11 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not 12 swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Protective Order. 13 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 14 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 15 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to 16 impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the 17 Designating Party to sanctions. 18 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 19 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 20 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 21 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 22 this Protective Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as 23 otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for 24 protection under this Protective Order must be clearly so designated before the 25 material is disclosed or produced. 26 Designation in conformity with this Protective Order requires: 27 (a) 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 5 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend 2 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that 3 contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available 7 for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party 8 has indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the 9 inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for 10 inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has 11 identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must 12 determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this 13 Protective Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing 14 Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains 15 Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies 16 for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 17 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 18 (b) for testimony given in depositions or in other pretrial or trial 19 proceedings, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of 20 the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, or by advising 21 the court reporter and all parties of such fact in writing at any time up to and 22 including the seventh day after the date of receipt of the deposition transcript. The 23 Parties agree that deposition testimony concerning material marked 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be deemed Protected Material encompassed within the 25 Protective Order. 26 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and 27 for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on 28 the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 6 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information or 2 item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify 3 the protected portion(s). 5.3 4 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected after discovery, 5 an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing 6 alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Protective 7 Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving 8 Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in 9 accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order. 10 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 11 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 12 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 13 Scheduling Order. 6.2 14 15 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq. 6.3 16 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 17 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper 18 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 19 parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating 20 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall 21 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 22 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the 23 challenge. 24 7. 25 ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 26 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 27 Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such 28 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 7 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 conditions described in this Protective Order. When the Action has been terminated, 2 a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL 3 DISPOSITION). 4 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 5 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 6 authorized under this Protective Order. 7 7.2 Names and Contact Information of Putative Class Members. With 8 respect to the names and contact information of putative class members produced 9 subject to this Protective Order, and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” the 10 11 12 13 following shall apply: (a) Plaintiff’s counsel shall maintain the names and contact information of the putative class members as private and confidential; (b) Plaintiff’s counsel agrees not to use the names and contact information 14 of the putative class members to solicit or cause another to solicit any of the 15 putative class members to assert any new claim, charge, or complaint of any kind 16 whatsoever against Defendant or for any other purpose other than for the limited 17 purpose of : (i) seeking information relevant to class certification issues, (ii) 18 Plaintiff’s claims as set forth in the Complaint, and/or (iii) Defendant’s defenses to 19 Plaintiff’s claims as set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint. 20 (c) The names and contact information of the putative class members shall 21 not be disclosed to Plaintiffs’ themselves. Rather, only Plaintiff’s counsel and 22 those identified in subsection (d) of this section may view this information. 23 (d) The names and contact information of the putative class members shall 24 not be disclosed by Plaintiffs’ counsel to any other person except the following: (a) 25 the legal, clerical, paralegal, or other staff of Plaintiff’s counsel, who will abide by 26 the terms of this Protective Order; (b) persons retained by Plaintiff’s counsel to 27 furnish expert or consulting services or advice in this action, who will abide by the 28 terms of this Protective Order; and (c) the Court and its personnel. The Parties MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 8 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 agree that this Paragraph, rather than Paragraph 7.3, shall apply to the disclosure of 2 the names and contact information of the putative class members 3 7.3 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 4 otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, or 5 as separately set forth in Paragraph 7.2, a Receiving Party may disclose any 6 information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 7 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as 8 well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 9 necessary to disclose the information for this Action; 10 11 12 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; (c) Experts (as defined in this Protective Order) of the Receiving Party to 13 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 14 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 15 (d) the Court and its personnel; 16 (e) Outside court reporters and their staff; 17 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional 18 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have 19 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 20 21 22 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; (h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the 23 Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party 24 requests that the witness sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 25 (Exhibit A) hereto; and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential 26 information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 27 (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the 28 Court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 9 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 reveal Protected Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may 2 not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective 3 Order; and (i) 4 any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 5 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 6 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 7 IN OTHER LITIGATION 8 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 9 10 11 12 13 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order 14 to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 15 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include 16 a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 17 18 19 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 20 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this 21 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the 22 subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s 23 permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 24 protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions 25 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action 26 to disobey a lawful subpoena issued in another action. 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 10 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE 2 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 3 (a) The terms of this Protective Order are applicable to information 4 produced by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5 Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is 6 protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Protective Order. Nothing in 7 these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking 8 additional protections. 9 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 10 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is 11 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 12 confidential information, then the Party shall: (1) 13 promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non- 14 Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality 15 agreement with a Non-Party; 16 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated 17 Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably 18 specific description of the information requested; and (3) 19 20 21 make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party, if requested. (c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this 22 Court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the 23 Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive 24 to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the 25 Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that 26 is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a 27 determination by the Court. Absent a Court order to the contrary, the Non-Party 28 shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this Court of its MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 11 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 Protected Material. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing 2 or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from 3 another court. 4 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 5 6 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 7 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in 8 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best 9 efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the 10 person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of 11 this Protective Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the 12 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit 13 A. 14 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE 15 PROTECTED MATERIAL 16 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain 17 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other 18 protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal 19 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify 20 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 21 production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 22 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure 23 of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work 24 product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated 25 protective order submitted to the Court. 26 12. 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Protective Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. No ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 12 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 modifications by the Parties shall have the force or effect of a Court order unless 2 the Court approves the modification. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 3 4 Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 5 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 6 this Stipulated Protective Order. No reference in this Order to a specific category of 7 documents, including but not limited to putative class member contact information, 8 shall be deemed as an admission that such information is relevant or required to be 9 produced in this case. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground 10 to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 11 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 12 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5, and if confidential 13 material is included in any documents to be filed in Court, such documents shall be 14 accompanied by an application, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, to file the 15 documents – or the confidential portion thereof – under seal. The application shall 16 be directed to the judge to whom the documents are directed. Pending the ruling on 17 the application, the documents or portions thereof subject to the sealing application 18 shall be lodged under seal. Local Rules 79-5.2 and 79-5.3 govern the disclosure of 19 confidential Court records. 12.4 Agreement to Abide by the Protective Order’s Terms. The Parties 20 21 understand and agree that during the time between their agreement on the terms of 22 this Protective Order and when the Court approves the Protective Order that they 23 will abide by the agreed-upon terms. In the event that the Court does not approve 24 the Protective Order, the Parties understand and agree that they will nonetheless 25 continue to honor the terms of the Protective Order. 26 13. 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP FINAL DISPOSITION After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 13 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As 2 used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 3 compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the 4 Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the 5 Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if 6 not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that 7 (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was 8 returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any 9 copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or 10 capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel 11 are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, 12 deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition 13 and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert 14 work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival 15 copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective 16 Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 17 14. 18 measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary 19 sanctions. 20 21 Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 30, 2015 22 23 By: ___________________/S/_____________________ MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUZANNE H. SEGAL 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 14 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 4 I, _________________________________ [print or type full name], of 5 ___________________________________________________________ [print or 6 type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety 7 and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States 8 District Court for the Central District of California on __________ [date] in the 9 case of Reynaldo Lopez, et al. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-07302- 10 SVW-SS. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this 11 Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so 12 comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I 13 solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item 14 that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in 15 strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 16 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court 17 for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this 18 Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after 19 termination of this action. I hereby appoint _____________________________ 20 [print or type full name] of ___________________________________________ 21 [print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service 22 of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement 23 of this Stipulated Protective Order. 24 Date: ____________________________ 25 City and State where sworn and signed:_____________________ 26 27 Printed name: _____________________________ 28 Signature: ________________________________ MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO 1 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?