Reynaldo Lopez et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc et al
Filing
11
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order 9 . (mr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
REYNALDO LOPEZ, an individual;
EUNICE DELGADILLO, an
individual; UMBERTO MENDOZA,
an individual; and AVEIA
TAUTOLO, an individual, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a
Georgia corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW (SSx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
[Discovery Document: Referred to
Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
1.
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Disclosure and discovery in this action is likely to involve production of
3
confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from
4
public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation
5
may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the
6
Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge
7
that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to
8
discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends
9
only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment
10
under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth
11
in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to
12
file confidential information under seal; the Central District of California’s Local
13
Rules, including Civil Local Rule 79-5, sets forth the procedures that must be
14
followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from
15
the Court to file material under seal.
16
A.
GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
17
This action is likely to involve proprietary business and confidential
18
employee information for which special protection from public disclosure and from
19
use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted.
20
Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of,
21
among other things, confidential business, commercial or financial information
22
(including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), private
23
information of Defendant’s current and former employees who are not parties to
24
this action (including information of these third parties regarding their health,
25
medical, and/or disability status, information regarding their leaves of absence from
26
employment, payroll records, employees’ private financial information (including
27
private bank account numbers, W-2, and payroll information), and/or information
28
regarding their separation from employment), that is otherwise generally
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES
1
PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from
2
disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common
3
law, and medical, personnel and/or financial information regarding the Plaintiffs,
4
including such information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which
5
may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal
6
statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law.
7
Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt
8
resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately
9
protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the
10
parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for
11
and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and
12
serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this
13
matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as
14
confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good
15
faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and
16
there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case.
17
2.
DEFINITIONS
18
2.1
Action: this pending federal lawsuit.
19
2.2
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the
20
21
designation of information or items under this Protective Order.
2.3
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of
22
how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for
23
protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), as specified above in the
24
Good Cause Statement, and including, but not limited to, the names and contact
25
information for putative class members.
26
27
2.4
Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House
Counsel (as well as their support staff).
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
2
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
2.5
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or
2
items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as
3
“CONFIDENTIAL.”
4
2.6
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless
5
of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,
6
among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced
7
or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
8
9
10
11
2.7
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter
pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as
an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.
2.8
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.
12
House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside
13
counsel.
14
15
16
2.9
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or
other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a
17
party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and
18
have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm
19
which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.
20
2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,
21
employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their
22
support staffs).
23
24
2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
Discovery Material in this Action.
25
2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation
26
support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
27
demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)
28
and their employees and subcontractors.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
3
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is
1
2
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery
3
4
Material from a Producing Party.
5
3.
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Protective Order cover not
6
7
only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or
8
extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or
9
compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any deposition testimony,
10
conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal
11
Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and
12
Protective Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is
13
in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part
14
of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of
15
publication not involving a violation of this Protective Order, including becoming
16
part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known
17
to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party
18
after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under
19
no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party.
20
Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate
21
agreement or order of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of
22
Protected Material at trial.
23
4.
24
DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations
25
imposed by this Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party
26
agrees otherwise in writing or a Court order otherwise directs. Final disposition
27
shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this
28
Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
4
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of
2
this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for
3
extension of time pursuant to applicable law.
4
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5
5.1
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.
6
Each Party or Non-Party who or which designates information or items for
7
protection under this Protective Order must take care to limit any such designation
8
to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating
9
Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items,
10
or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the material,
11
documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not
12
swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Protective Order.
13
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations
14
that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper
15
purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to
16
impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the
17
Designating Party to sanctions.
18
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it
19
designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must
20
promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation.
21
5.2
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in
22
this Protective Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as
23
otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for
24
protection under this Protective Order must be clearly so designated before the
25
material is disclosed or produced.
26
Designation in conformity with this Protective Order requires:
27
(a)
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic
documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
5
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend
2
“CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that
3
contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page
4
qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected
5
portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
6
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available
7
for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party
8
has indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the
9
inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for
10
inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has
11
identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must
12
determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this
13
Protective Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing
14
Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains
15
Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies
16
for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected
17
portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
18
(b)
for testimony given in depositions or in other pretrial or trial
19
proceedings, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of
20
the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, or by advising
21
the court reporter and all parties of such fact in writing at any time up to and
22
including the seventh day after the date of receipt of the deposition transcript. The
23
Parties agree that deposition testimony concerning material marked
24
“CONFIDENTIAL” shall be deemed Protected Material encompassed within the
25
Protective Order.
26
(c)
for information produced in some form other than documentary and
27
for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on
28
the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
6
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information or
2
item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify
3
the protected portion(s).
5.3
4
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected after discovery,
5
an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing
6
alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Protective
7
Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving
8
Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in
9
accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order.
10
6.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
11
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
12
designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s
13
Scheduling Order.
6.2
14
15
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute
resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq.
6.3
16
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on
17
the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper
18
purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other
19
parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating
20
Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall
21
continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is
22
entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the
23
challenge.
24
7.
25
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is
26
disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this
27
Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such
28
Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
7
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
conditions described in this Protective Order. When the Action has been terminated,
2
a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL
3
DISPOSITION).
4
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
5
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons
6
authorized under this Protective Order.
7
7.2
Names and Contact Information of Putative Class Members. With
8
respect to the names and contact information of putative class members produced
9
subject to this Protective Order, and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” the
10
11
12
13
following shall apply:
(a)
Plaintiff’s counsel shall maintain the names and contact information of
the putative class members as private and confidential;
(b)
Plaintiff’s counsel agrees not to use the names and contact information
14
of the putative class members to solicit or cause another to solicit any of the
15
putative class members to assert any new claim, charge, or complaint of any kind
16
whatsoever against Defendant or for any other purpose other than for the limited
17
purpose of : (i) seeking information relevant to class certification issues, (ii)
18
Plaintiff’s claims as set forth in the Complaint, and/or (iii) Defendant’s defenses to
19
Plaintiff’s claims as set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint.
20
(c)
The names and contact information of the putative class members shall
21
not be disclosed to Plaintiffs’ themselves. Rather, only Plaintiff’s counsel and
22
those identified in subsection (d) of this section may view this information.
23
(d)
The names and contact information of the putative class members shall
24
not be disclosed by Plaintiffs’ counsel to any other person except the following: (a)
25
the legal, clerical, paralegal, or other staff of Plaintiff’s counsel, who will abide by
26
the terms of this Protective Order; (b) persons retained by Plaintiff’s counsel to
27
furnish expert or consulting services or advice in this action, who will abide by the
28
terms of this Protective Order; and (c) the Court and its personnel. The Parties
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
8
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
agree that this Paragraph, rather than Paragraph 7.3, shall apply to the disclosure of
2
the names and contact information of the putative class members
3
7.3
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless
4
otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, or
5
as separately set forth in Paragraph 7.2, a Receiving Party may disclose any
6
information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
7
(a)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as
8
well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably
9
necessary to disclose the information for this Action;
10
11
12
(b)
the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of
the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;
(c)
Experts (as defined in this Protective Order) of the Receiving Party to
13
whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the
14
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
15
(d)
the Court and its personnel;
16
(e)
Outside court reporters and their staff;
17
(f)
professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional
18
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have
19
signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
20
21
22
(g)
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
(h)
during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the
23
Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party
24
requests that the witness sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
25
(Exhibit A) hereto; and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential
26
information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
27
(Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the
28
Court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
9
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
reveal Protected Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may
2
not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective
3
Order; and
(i)
4
any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,
5
mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions.
6
8.
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED
7
IN OTHER LITIGATION
8
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation
9
10
11
12
13
that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
(a)
promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification
shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b)
promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order
14
to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
15
subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include
16
a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and
17
18
19
(c)
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be
pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with
20
the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this
21
action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the
22
subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s
23
permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking
24
protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions
25
should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action
26
to disobey a lawful subpoena issued in another action.
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
10
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE
2
PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION
3
(a)
The terms of this Protective Order are applicable to information
4
produced by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
5
Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is
6
protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Protective Order. Nothing in
7
these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking
8
additional protections.
9
(b)
In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to
10
produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is
11
subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s
12
confidential information, then the Party shall:
(1)
13
promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-
14
Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality
15
agreement with a Non-Party;
16
(2)
promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated
17
Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably
18
specific description of the information requested; and
(3)
19
20
21
make the information requested available for inspection by the
Non-Party, if requested.
(c)
If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this
22
Court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the
23
Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive
24
to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the
25
Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that
26
is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a
27
determination by the Court. Absent a Court order to the contrary, the Non-Party
28
shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this Court of its
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
11
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
Protected Material. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing
2
or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from
3
another court.
4
10.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
5
6
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this
7
Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in
8
writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best
9
efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the
10
person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of
11
this Protective Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the
12
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit
13
A.
14
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
15
PROTECTED MATERIAL
16
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain
17
inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other
18
protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal
19
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify
20
whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for
21
production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence
22
502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure
23
of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work
24
product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated
25
protective order submitted to the Court.
26
12.
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Protective Order abridges the
right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. No
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
12
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
modifications by the Parties shall have the force or effect of a Court order unless
2
the Court approves the modification.
12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
3
4
Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to
5
disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in
6
this Stipulated Protective Order. No reference in this Order to a specific category of
7
documents, including but not limited to putative class member contact information,
8
shall be deemed as an admission that such information is relevant or required to be
9
produced in this case. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground
10
to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.
11
12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
12
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5, and if confidential
13
material is included in any documents to be filed in Court, such documents shall be
14
accompanied by an application, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, to file the
15
documents – or the confidential portion thereof – under seal. The application shall
16
be directed to the judge to whom the documents are directed. Pending the ruling on
17
the application, the documents or portions thereof subject to the sealing application
18
shall be lodged under seal. Local Rules 79-5.2 and 79-5.3 govern the disclosure of
19
confidential Court records.
12.4 Agreement to Abide by the Protective Order’s Terms. The Parties
20
21
understand and agree that during the time between their agreement on the terms of
22
this Protective Order and when the Court approves the Protective Order that they
23
will abide by the agreed-upon terms. In the event that the Court does not approve
24
the Protective Order, the Parties understand and agree that they will nonetheless
25
continue to honor the terms of the Protective Order.
26
13.
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
FINAL DISPOSITION
After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60
days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
13
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As
2
used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,
3
compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the
4
Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the
5
Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if
6
not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that
7
(1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was
8
returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any
9
copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or
10
capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel
11
are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial,
12
deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition
13
and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert
14
work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival
15
copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective
16
Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
17
14.
18
measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary
19
sanctions.
20
21
Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 30, 2015
22
23
By: ___________________/S/_____________________
MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUZANNE H. SEGAL
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
14
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
4
I, _________________________________ [print or type full name], of
5
___________________________________________________________ [print or
6
type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety
7
and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States
8
District Court for the Central District of California on __________ [date] in the
9
case of Reynaldo Lopez, et al. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-
10
SVW-SS. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this
11
Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so
12
comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I
13
solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item
14
that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in
15
strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.
16
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court
17
for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this
18
Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after
19
termination of this action. I hereby appoint _____________________________
20
[print or type full name] of ___________________________________________
21
[print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service
22
of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement
23
of this Stipulated Protective Order.
24
Date: ____________________________
25
City and State where sworn and signed:_____________________
26
27
Printed name: _____________________________
28
Signature: ________________________________
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
1
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-07302-SVW-SS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?