Tabitha Spencer v. Kohls Department Stores, Inc. et al.
Filing
13
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Upon consideration of the parties' stipulation, it is hereby ordered that this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC587955. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the removal of this action and other proceedings in this Court. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Remand letter) (bp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date: November 13, 2015
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Name & Address
Los Angeles County Superior Court
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: 2:15-cv-7380-DSF(RAOx)
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC587955
Case Name: Tabitha Spencer -v- Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on November 13, 2015
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: Brent_Pacillas@cacd.uscourts.gov.
Deputy Clerk
213-894-
G Western
✘
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?