Stephan Brooks v. Paco-Michelle Atwood et al

Filing 68

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter 67 . The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that Judgment be entered: (1) dismiss ing the action against the non-appearing Defendants without prejudice in accordance with this Order; and (2) otherwise dismissing the action in accordance with the previous Orders filed 6/20/16 and 1/5/17. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 STEPHAN BROOKS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) PACO-MICHELLE ATWOOD, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) NO. CV 15-7724-JFW(E) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 19 First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached 20 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. 21 the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the 22 Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. 23 Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 24 Recommendation. Further, The 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) dismissing the action 27 against the non-appearing Defendants without prejudice in accordance 28 with this Order; and (2) otherwise dismissing the action in accordance 1 with the previous Orders filed June 20, 2016 and January 5, 2017. 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of 4 this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the 5 Judgment herein on Plaintiff and on all counsel of record. 6 7 DATED: February 9, 2017. 8 9 10 11 _______________________________ JOHN F. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?