Stephan Brooks v. Paco-Michelle Atwood et al
Filing
68
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter 67 . The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that Judgment be entered: (1) dismiss ing the action against the non-appearing Defendants without prejudice in accordance with this Order; and (2) otherwise dismissing the action in accordance with the previous Orders filed 6/20/16 and 1/5/17. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
STEPHAN BROOKS, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
PACO-MICHELLE ATWOOD, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
NO. CV 15-7724-JFW(E)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
19
First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached
20
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
21
the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the
22
Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made.
23
Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
24
Recommendation.
Further,
The
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) dismissing the action
27
against the non-appearing Defendants without prejudice in accordance
28
with this Order; and (2) otherwise dismissing the action in accordance
1
with the previous Orders filed June 20, 2016 and January 5, 2017.
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of
4
this Order, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the
5
Judgment herein on Plaintiff and on all counsel of record.
6
7
DATED: February 9, 2017.
8
9
10
11
_______________________________
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?