Sonnie E Davis v. Jeffey Beard et al

Filing 29

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before July 27, 2016 why Defendant's motion should not be granted and this action dismissed. Plaintiff may discharge this orde r by filing a signed opposition to the motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and Local Rule 11-1, along with completed proof of service stating the date on which a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to eac h Defendant or Defendant's counsel. If Plaintiff files an opposition on or before July 27, 2016, Defendant may file an optional reply on or before August 3, 2016, at which time the matter will be taken under submission. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file a timely response to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. (Attachments: # 1 Voluntary Dismissal) (mkr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

15-CV-7963 GHK (SK)

Title

Sonnie E. Davis III v. M. Reynoso, et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

July 13, 2016

Steve Kim

Marc Krause

n/a

Deputy Clerk

Court Smart / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None present

None present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On May 27, 2016, Defendants filed a notice of motion and motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
complaint. (Dkt. 22). Plaintiff filed an unsigned opposition to the motion to dismiss on June
24, 2016, along with incomplete proof of service. (Dkt 26). Citing these deficiencies, this Court
issued a Notice of Document Discrepancy rejecting Plaintiff’s opposition and proof of service
on June 24, 2016. (Dkt. 27). As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed a signed
opposition with completed proof of service. “The failure to file any required document, or the
failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the
motion.” L.R. 7-12.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before July 27, 2016 why
Defendant’s motion should not be granted and this action dismissed. Plaintiff may discharge
this order by filing a signed opposition to the motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 11(a) and Local Rule 11-1, along with completed proof of service stating the
date on which a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to each Defendant or
Defendant’s counsel. If Plaintiff files an opposition on or before July 27, 2016, Defendant may
file an optional reply on or before August 3, 2016, at which time the matter will be taken under
submission.
Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file a timely response to this order will result in
a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order and
failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 41-1. If Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this
action, Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a) by filing a “Notice of Dismissal,” attached. The Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with
a Notice of Dismissal Form (CV-009).
CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1