Evox Productions, LLC v. California Rent-A-Car, Inc., et al

Filing 21

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. *See Order for details.* (es)

Download PDF
1 BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP Keith J. Wesley (State Bar No. 229276) kwesley@bgrfirm.com Jonathan L. Gottfried (State Bar No. 282301) 3 jgottfried@bgrfirm.com 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2400 4 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 274-7100 5 Facsimile: (310) 275-5697 2 6 Attorneys for EVOX Productions, LLC 7 DEL TONDO & THOMAS Douglas J. Del Tondo (State Bar No. 100563) doug@deltondothomas.com 2201 Dupont Drive, Suite 820 9 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 851-0558 10 Facsimile: (949) 266-9621 8 11 Attorneys for California Rent-A-Car, Inc. and Steve Vahidi 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 EVOX Productions, LLC, Case No. 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO Plaintiff, 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE vs. 18 ORDER 19 California Rent-A-Car, Inc., and , STEVE VAHIDI, an individual, 20 Defendant. 21 22 1. 23 A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 25 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 26 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 27 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 28 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 589676.1 -1[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 2 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 3 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 4 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 5 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 6 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 7 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 8 B. 9 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve trade secrets and other valuable commercial 10 and/or proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure 11 and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. 12 Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 13 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 14 confidential business practices, or other confidential commercial information, 15 information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 16 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 17 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 18 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 19 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep 20 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 21 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling 22 at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 23 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information 24 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 25 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 26 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 27 record of this case. 28 589676.1 -2[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 C. 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL 3 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 4 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 5 under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 6 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court 7 to file material under seal. 8 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 9 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, 10 good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and 11 County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors 12 Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics, 13 Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders 14 require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling 15 reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with 16 respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere 17 designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— 18 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 19 material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or 20 otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 21 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 22 compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the 23 relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. 24 See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For 25 each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced 26 under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking 27 protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal 28 589676.1 -3[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting 2 the application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration 3 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in 4 its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. 5 If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting 6 only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, 7 shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their 8 entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 9 2. 10 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: EVOX Productions, LLC v. California Rent-A- 11 Car, Inc. and Steve Vahidi., 2:15-cv-08046 12 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 13 designation of information or items under this Order. 14 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 15 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 16 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 17 the Good Cause Statement. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 19 their support staff). 20 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 21 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 24 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 25 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 26 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 27 28 589676.1 -4[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 3 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 4 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 5 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 6 counsel. 7 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 8 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 10 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 11 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 12 has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 13 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 14 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 15 support staffs). 16 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 17 Discovery Material in this Action. 18 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 19 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 20 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 21 and their employees and subcontractors. 22 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 23 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 25 from a Producing Party. 26 3. SCOPE 27 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 28 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 589676.1 -5[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 2 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 3 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 4 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 5 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 6 4. DURATION 7 Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the information that was designated as 8 confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and will 9 be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless 10 compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are 11 made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and County of 12 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good cause” 13 showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” 14 standard when merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the 15 terms of this protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 16 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 17 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 18 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 19 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 20 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 21 protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 22 communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, 23 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 24 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 25 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 26 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 27 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose 28 589676.1 -6[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating 2 Party to sanctions. 3 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 4 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 5 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 6 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 7 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 8 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 9 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 10 produced. 11 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 12 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 13 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 14 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend 15 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that 16 contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 17 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 18 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 19 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection 20 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 21 which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 22 before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be 23 deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 24 documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which 25 documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, 26 before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 27 “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a 28 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 589676.1 -7[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 2 markings in the margins). 3 (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party 4 identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the 5 deposition all protected testimony, or within five calendar days of receipt of the 6 transcript. 7 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary 8 and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place 9 on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the 10 legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information 11 warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the 12 protected portion(s). 13 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 14 failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive 15 the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. 16 Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable 17 efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this 18 Order. 19 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 20 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 21 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 22 Scheduling Order. 23 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute 24 resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq. 25 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 26 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper 27 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 28 parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating 589676.1 -8[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall 2 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 3 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the 4 challenge. 5 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 6 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 7 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 8 Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such 9 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 10 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a 11 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL 12 DISPOSITION). 13 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 14 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 15 authorized under this Order. 16 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 17 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 18 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 19 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 20 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, 21 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 22 necessary to disclose the information for this Action; 23 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) 24 of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; 25 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 26 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 27 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 28 (d) 589676.1 the court and its personnel; -9[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 (e) court reporters and their staff; 2 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and 3 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action 4 and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit 5 A); 6 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information 7 or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 8 (h) during their depositions, witnesses ,and attorneys for witnesses, 9 in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing 10 party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; and 11 (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign 12 the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise 13 agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed 14 deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may 15 be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except 16 as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 17 (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting 18 personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement 19 discussions. 20 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 21 IN OTHER LITIGATION 22 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 23 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as 24 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 25 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such 26 notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 27 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or 28 order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 589676.1 -10[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include 2 a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 3 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be 4 pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 5 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 6 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this 7 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the 8 subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s 9 permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 10 protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions 11 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action 12 to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 13 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE 14 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 15 (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced 16 by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such 17 information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected 18 by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions 19 should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 20 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, 21 to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is 22 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 23 confidential information, then the Party shall: 24 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non- 25 Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality 26 agreement with a Non-Party; 27 28 589676.1 -11[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated 2 Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably 3 specific description of the information requested; and 4 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the 5 Non-Party, if requested. 6 (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court 7 within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving 8 Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the 9 discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving 10 Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to 11 the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the 12 court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and 13 expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 14 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 15 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 16 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 17 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in 18 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts 19 to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or 20 persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, 21 and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and 22 Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 23 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE 24 PROTECTED MATERIAL 25 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain 26 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, 27 the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil 28 Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever 589676.1 -12[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 2 without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and 3 (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a 4 communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work 5 product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated 6 protective order submitted to the court. 7 12. MISCELLANEOUS 8 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 9 person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 10 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 11 Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 12 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this 13 Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any 14 ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 15 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 16 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may 17 only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 18 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material 19 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information 20 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 21 12.4 Privilege Log. The parties are not required to include on any privilege 22 log documents or things otherwise protected by the attorney-client privilege, work 23 product immunity, or other privilege or protection (“Privileged Materials”) dated on 24 or after October 14, 2015 (the “cut-off date”). In addition, Privileged Materials 25 created by or on behalf of litigation counsel or exchanged with litigation counsel, 26 regardless of their date, do not need to be included on any privilege log. 27 12.5 Communications Between Expert and People Employed by Expert. 28 The parties agree that communications between any Expert and people employed by 589676.1 -13[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 that Expert in connection with this Action will be treated as privileged and will not 2 be produced. 3 13. 4 After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 FINAL DISPOSITION 5 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return 6 all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in 7 this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, 8 summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 9 Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving 10 Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same 11 person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies 12 (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or 13 destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, 14 abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any 15 of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to 16 retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing 17 transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert 18 reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such 19 materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or 20 constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in 21 Section 4 (DURATION). 22 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 28 589676.1 -14[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 14. Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate 2 measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary 3 sanctions. 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 6 7 DATED: January , 2016 8 BROWNE GEORGE ROSS LLP Keith J. Wesley Jonathan L. Gottfried 9 10 By 11 Jonathan L. Gottfried Attorneys for EVOX Productions, LLC 12 13 DATED: January , 2016 14 DEL TONDO & THOMAS Douglas J. Del Tondo 15 By 16 Douglas J. Del Tondo Attorneys for California Rent-A-Car, Inc. and Steve Vahidi 17 18 19 20 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 DATED: January 19, 2016 22 23 ______________________________ 24 United States District/Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 589676.1 -15[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, [print or type full name], of 4 [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury 5 that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that 6 was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California 7 on [date] in the case of EVOX Productions, LLC v. California Rent-A-Car, Inc. and 8 Steve Vahidi, 2:15-cv-08046. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the 9 terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that 10 failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of 11 contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information 12 or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity 13 except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 14 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 15 Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this 16 Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after 17 termination of this action. I hereby appoint 18 or type full name] of [print [print or type 19 full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in 20 connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this 21 Stipulated Protective Order. 22 Date: 23 City and State where sworn and signed: 24 Printed name: 25 Signature: 26 27 28 589676.1 -16[[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2:15-cv-08046-MWF-RAO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?