Carlisa Ware v. Antelope Valley Union High School District et al
Filing
55
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich: GRANTED. (see document for further details) 54 (klg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Surisa Rivers, State Bar No. 250868
Sarah Gross, State Bar No. 292170
SURISA RIVERS LAW OFFICE
2529 Foothill Blvd., Suite 202
La Crescenta, CA 91214
Phone: (818) 330-7012
Fax: (213) 402-6077
surisa@riverslawoffice.org
sarah@riverslawoffice.org
Wilmer J. Harris, State Bar No. 150407
Isabel M. Daniels, State Bar No. 270887
SCHONBRUN SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN, LLP
715 Fremont Avenue, Suite A
S. Pasadena, CA 91030
Phone: (626)441-4129
Fax: (626)283-5770
wharris@sshhlaw.com
idaniels@sshhlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARLISA WARE, through her
guardians ad litem, MONTE AND
DENISE WARE,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
ANTELOPE VALLEY UNION HIGH )
SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRUCE
)
GARVER; AND
)
SUPERINDENDENT, DAVID J.
)
VIERRA, and DOES 1-10,
)
)
Defendants. )
)
)
CASE NO. 2:15-CV- 08124-DMG-AJW
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Complaint Filed: 10/15/15
Fourth Amended Complaint filed: 02/27/17
Trial Date: 03/13/18
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
The Court, having reviewed and considered the Stipulated Protective Order
2
between the parties, submitted on September 25, 2017 (the “Stipulated Protective
3
Order”) and good cause appearing for same, hereby ORDERS as follows:
4
5
The Stipulated Protective Order shall be and hereby is approved and
6
incorporated herein by its reference as though set forth in full as an Order of the
7
Court.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Date: September 27, 2017
____________________________________
12
Hon. Andrew J. Wistrich
13
United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?