Carlisa Ware v. Antelope Valley Union High School District et al

Filing 55

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich: GRANTED. (see document for further details) 54 (klg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Surisa Rivers, State Bar No. 250868 Sarah Gross, State Bar No. 292170 SURISA RIVERS LAW OFFICE 2529 Foothill Blvd., Suite 202 La Crescenta, CA 91214 Phone: (818) 330-7012 Fax: (213) 402-6077 surisa@riverslawoffice.org sarah@riverslawoffice.org Wilmer J. Harris, State Bar No. 150407 Isabel M. Daniels, State Bar No. 270887 SCHONBRUN SEPLOW HARRIS & HOFFMAN, LLP 715 Fremont Avenue, Suite A S. Pasadena, CA 91030 Phone: (626)441-4129 Fax: (626)283-5770 wharris@sshhlaw.com idaniels@sshhlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CARLISA WARE, through her guardians ad litem, MONTE AND DENISE WARE, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) ANTELOPE VALLEY UNION HIGH ) SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRUCE ) GARVER; AND ) SUPERINDENDENT, DAVID J. ) VIERRA, and DOES 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:15-CV- 08124-DMG-AJW [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Complaint Filed: 10/15/15 Fourth Amended Complaint filed: 02/27/17 Trial Date: 03/13/18 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 The Court, having reviewed and considered the Stipulated Protective Order 2 between the parties, submitted on September 25, 2017 (the “Stipulated Protective 3 Order”) and good cause appearing for same, hereby ORDERS as follows: 4 5 The Stipulated Protective Order shall be and hereby is approved and 6 incorporated herein by its reference as though set forth in full as an Order of the 7 Court. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Date: September 27, 2017 ____________________________________ 12 Hon. Andrew J. Wistrich 13 United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?