Ahmet Dogan et al v. Ehud Barak

Filing 57

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs shall recover nothing from Defendant; 2. Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; 3. Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiffs as evidence by a Bill of Costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11
12

AHMET DOĞAN, individually and on
behalf of FURKAN DOĞAN; HIMET
DOĞAN, individually and on behalf of
FURKAN DOĞAN,

13

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

14
15

Case № 2:15-cv-08130-ODW(GSJx)

v.
EHUD BARAK,

16

Defendant.

17
18

On October 16, 2015, Plaintiffs Ahmet Doğan, individually and on behalf of

19

Furkan Doğan, and Himet Doğan, individually and on behalf of Furkan Doğan

20

(collectively “Plaintiffs”), filed a Complaint against Defendant Ehud Barak

21

(“Defendant”), in which they assert eight claims under the Alien Tort Claims Act, 28

22

U.S.C. § 1350, the Torture Victim Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 note, and the Anti-

23

Terrorism Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2333. (ECF No. 1.) On October 13, 2016, the Court

24

granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss without leave to amend. (ECF No. 56.)

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

2

1.

Plaintiffs shall recover nothing from Defendant;

3

2.

Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice;

4

3.

Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiffs as evidence by a Bill of

5

Costs.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

October 13, 2016

10
11
12
13

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2