Muhammad J.D. Akbar v. Johnnathan Hannah et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 25, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice without further warning from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)

Download PDF
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court Central District of California 9 10 11 12 MUHAMMAD J.D. AKBAR, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:15-CV-08159-ODW(KS) v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY JOHNNATHAN HANNAH, BANK THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE MANAGER at 400 SO. MARKET DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STREET, INGLEWOOD, CA PROSECUTION Defendants. 19 20 21 On October 16, 2015, Plaintiff Muhammad J.D. Akbar filed a complaint 22 alleging that Johnnathan Hannah, an employee of the Wells Fargo Bank branch 23 located at 400 So. Market Street, Inglewood, California and the Bank Manager at that 24 branch, had committed fraud and embezzled money from Plaintiff’s bank account. 25 (Compl., ECF No. 1.) However, Defendants never filed an answer. Plaintiff has 26 taken no further action to prosecute this case. 27 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no 28 later than October 25, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without 1 prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely 2 written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without 3 prejudice without further warning from the Court. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 October 11, 2016 7 8 9 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?