Donald Chambers v. David Seitz et al

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge S. James Otero, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 26 . In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice.Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type, includingattorneys fees. There is no prevailing party in this action.IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)

1

JS-6

2
3

September 15, 2016.

4

VC
P

5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

Plaintiff, ORDER

13
14
15

Case No. CV15-08229 SJO (JPR)

DONALD CHAMBERS,

v.
D. SEITZ, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and

19

pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice.

20

Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type, including

21

attorney’s fees. There is no prevailing party in this action.

22
23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 15, 2016
Dated: _________________________

__________________________
The Honorable Jean P. Rosenbluth

25
26
27
28
1