Kyle Anthony Lewis v. United States America
Filing
94
AMENDED JUDGMENT 90 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court orders that plaintiff Kyle Lewis recover from defendant United States America the amount of $144,483.00, plus $2,154.11 in costs (per Court Order). Post judgment interest at a ra te of 1.16% per annum is awarded to plaintiff in the event that: (1) the United States appeals; (2) the judgment is affirmed on appeal; and (3) plaintiff files the transcript of the judgment with the Secretary of the Treasury. Such interest shall be paid "only from the date of filing of the transcript of the judgment with the Secretary of the Treasury through the day before the date of the mandate of affirmance." (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Kyle Anthony Lewis,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
No. CV 15-8354-CAS (ASx)
Amended Judgment
– v. –
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
United States District Judge
United States of America,
Defendant.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
This action was tried to the Court on October 21, October 27, October 28 and
November 3, 2016. William Karns appeared for plaintiff and Assistant U.S. Attorney
Garrett Coyle appeared for the United States.
The Court decided in favor of plaintiff. The Court orders that plaintiff, KYLE
LEWIS, recover from defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA the amount of
$144,483.00, plus $2,154.11 in costs (per Court Order). Post judgment interest at a rate
of 1.16% per annum is awarded to plaintiff in the event that: (1) the United States
appeals; (2) the judgment is affirmed on appeal; and (3) plaintiff files the transcript of the
judgment with the Secretary of the Treasury. Such interest shall be paid “only from the
date of filing of the transcript of the judgment with the Secretary of the Treasury through
the day before the date of the mandate of affirmance.” See 31 U.S.C. § 1304(b)(1)(A).
24
25
Dated: June 20, 2017
26
27
28
Honorable Christina A. Snyder
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?