Thomas Hill v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
18
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 17 . The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed in part and the matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and (2) Judgment be entered accordingly. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (dml)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THOMAS HILL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all
18
20
21
of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”). The Court
approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the decision of the Commissioner of
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant.
17
19
Case No. CV 15-8450 ODW(JC)
Social Security is reversed in part and the matter is remanded for further
administrative action consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and
(2) Judgment be entered accordingly.
///
///
///
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the
2 Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment on counsel for the parties.
3
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
4 DATED: __September 14, 2016
5
6
________________________________________
7
HONORABLE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?