Randall Allen v. Raytheon Company et al
Filing
26
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Defendant Raytheon Company shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff Randall Allen.Plaintiff shall take nothing byhis action. Defendant shall have its costs of suit. (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
Case No. 2:15-cv-08465-SJO-RAO
RANDALL ALLEN, an individual,
12
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
RAYTHEON COMPANY, a Delaware
Corporation doing business in
California,
15
16
Defendant.
17
18
Pursuant to the Court’s September 6, 2016 Minute Order granting the Motion
19
for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Raytheon Company (“Defendant”),
20
which granted summary judgment to Defendant on all claims asserted by Plaintiff
21
Randall Allen (“Plaintiff”),
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant
23
shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff and Plaintiff shall take nothing by
24
his action.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
26
Defendant shall have its costs of suit.
27
Dated: September 22, 2016
28
S. JAMES OTERO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-08465-SJO-RAO
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?