Randall Allen v. Raytheon Company et al

Filing 26

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Defendant Raytheon Company shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff Randall Allen.Plaintiff shall take nothing byhis action. Defendant shall have its costs of suit. (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

Case No. 2:15-cv-08465-SJO-RAO

RANDALL ALLEN, an individual,

12

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

RAYTHEON COMPANY, a Delaware
Corporation doing business in
California,

15
16

Defendant.

17
18

Pursuant to the Court’s September 6, 2016 Minute Order granting the Motion

19

for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Raytheon Company (“Defendant”),

20

which granted summary judgment to Defendant on all claims asserted by Plaintiff

21

Randall Allen (“Plaintiff”),

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant

23

shall have judgment in its favor against Plaintiff and Plaintiff shall take nothing by

24

his action.

25

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that

26

Defendant shall have its costs of suit.

27

Dated: September 22, 2016

28

S. JAMES OTERO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-08465-SJO-RAO
JUDGMENT