Victor Arzate v Los Angeles Sherrif Dept Fraud and Coruption

Filing 117

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge David O. Carter for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 105 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;2. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint (Dkt. 99) is GRANTED; 3. Plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice; and 4. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. (mba)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LOS ANGELES SHERRIF DEPT, ) FRAUD AND CORRUPTION, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) VICTOR ARZATE, Case No.: CV 15-08466-DOC (JDE) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, 19 including the Fifth Amended Complaint, the Report and Recommendation of 20 the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, the Objection, Request for 21 Supplementary Attachments and Request for Reconsideration filed by 22 Plaintiff, and the Reply to Objection filed by Defendants. Further, the Court 23 has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and 24 Recommendation to which objections have been made. 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 27 2. The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Fifth Amended 28 Complaint (Dkt. 99) is GRANTED; 1 3. amend and with prejudice; and 2 3 Plaintiff’s Fifth Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to 4. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. 4 5 6 Dated: July 12, 2017 7 ______________________________ DAVID O. CARTER United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?