Zoe Muntaner v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
44
AMENDED JUDGMENT 43 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to the Court's Order granting Defendant's Motion for SummaryJudgment 20 36 , filed on October 21, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Target Corporation, and against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Target Corporation shall be entitled to recover costs against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner in the amount of $5,450.03, pursuant to this Court's granting of Defendant Target Corporation's unopposed Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs 42 . (lom)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
ZOE MUNTANER,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. CV 15-8480-DMG (PLAx)
v.
AMENDED JUDGMENT [43]
TARGET CORPORATION; and DOES
1-100, Inclusive,
Defendant.
16
17
Pursuant to the Court’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary
18
Judgment [Doc. # 36], filed on October 21, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
19
ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Target
20
Corporation, and against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner.
21
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Target Corporation shall be
22
entitled to recover costs against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner in the amount of $5,450.03,
23
pursuant to this Court’s granting of Defendant Target Corporation’s unopposed
24
Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs [Doc. #42].
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER
25
26
27
28
DATED: January 10, 2017
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?