Zoe Muntaner v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 44

AMENDED JUDGMENT 43 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to the Court's Order granting Defendant's Motion for SummaryJudgment 20 36 , filed on October 21, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Target Corporation, and against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Target Corporation shall be entitled to recover costs against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner in the amount of $5,450.03, pursuant to this Court's granting of Defendant Target Corporation's unopposed Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs 42 . (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 ZOE MUNTANER, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. CV 15-8480-DMG (PLAx) v. AMENDED JUDGMENT [43] TARGET CORPORATION; and DOES 1-100, Inclusive, Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to the Court’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary 18 Judgment [Doc. # 36], filed on October 21, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, 19 ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Target 20 Corporation, and against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner. 21 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Target Corporation shall be 22 entitled to recover costs against Plaintiff Zoe Muntaner in the amount of $5,450.03, 23 pursuant to this Court’s granting of Defendant Target Corporation’s unopposed 24 Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs [Doc. #42]. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 10, 2017 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?