Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Best Global Logistics USA, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 82 . The Court approves the Stipulation andRequest for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice and orders that the entireaction, including all Cros s Claims and the Third Party Complaint, be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to re-opening by application of NYK against only those parties who have not complied with their settlement paymentobligations, provided such re-opening by NYK is sought on or before December11, 2017. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Alan Nakazawa, State Bar No. 84670
[e-mail]
2 COGSWELL NAKAZAWA & CHANG, LLP
444 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1410
3 Long Beach, California 90802-8131
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
1

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
NIPPON YUSEN KAISHA

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

NIPPON YUSEN KAISHA, doing
business as NYK LINE,

)
)
)
12
Plaintiff,
)
)
13
vs.
)
)
14 BEST GLOBAL LOGISTICS USA,
)
INC.; OWNERS LOGISTICS CO.,
)
15 LTD.,
)
)
16
Defendants.
)
)
17 _______________________________ )
)
18 AND RELATED CROSS ACTIONS. )
_______________________________ )
11

CASE NO.: CV15-08540 MWF (GJSx)
IN ADMIRALTY
ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

//
//

28

ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court approves the Stipulation and

2

Request for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice and orders that the entire

3

action, including all Cross Claims and the Third Party Complaint, be and is hereby

4

dismissed with prejudice, subject to re-opening by application of NYK against

5

only those parties who have not complied with their settlement payment

6

obligations, provided such re-opening by NYK is sought on or before December

7

11, 2017. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Dated:

January 5, 2017

________________________________
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
-2-