JMT Inc. v. Intermatic Inc. et al

Filing 212

ORDER On Stipulation of Dismissal 21 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips that theabove-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Allparties to bear their own costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

A. LOUIS DORNY (SBN: 212054)
[e-mail]
WEISS B. HAMID (SBN: 300792)
[e-mail]
GORDON & REES LLP
633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JMT INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
Gordon & Rees LLP
633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071

11

JMT INC., a California Corporation,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-08603-BRO-JC
C/W
2:15-cv-09320-BRO-JC

Plaintiff,
vs.
INTERMATIC INC., an Illinois
Corporation; BROAN-NUTONE, LLC, a
Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 to10,
inclusive,

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL

Defendants.
AND CONSOLIDATED ACTION.

19
20

Upon review of the Stipulation,

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the

22

above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). All

23

parties to bear their own costs.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: September 21, 2017

___________________________
Beverly Reid O’Connell
United States District Judge

27
28
-1-

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL