Rebecca L. Bond v. Onewest Bank FSB et al
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 11 . Moreover, Defendants have responded to the Complaint, and are therefore not in default by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc) Modified on 12/23/2015 (lc).
O
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
REBECCA L. BOND,
Case № 2:15-cv-8701-ODW (ASx)
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
14
ONEWEST BANK FSB; OCWEN LOAN MOTION FOR DEFAULT
15
SERVICING,
JUDGMENT [11]
Defendants.
16
17
On December 14, 2015, Plaintiff Rebecca L. Bond moved to enter a default
18
judgment against Defendants OneWest Bank FSB and Ocwen Loan Serving.
19
However, Plaintiff did not previously request an entry of default against these
20
Defendants. An entry of default must precede a grant of default judgment. Johnson v.
21
Dayton Elec. Mfg. Co., 140 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1998). Moreover, Defendants
22
have responded to the Complaint, and are therefore not in default. (ECF No. 8.)
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
As a result, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment.1 (ECF
1
2
No. 11.)
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
December 23, 2015
5
6
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the Court deems
the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?