Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. v. Jian Lu et al

Filing 101

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: Plaintiff's Motion is hereby GRANTED in full and judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Sirona and against Defendant Jian Lu as follows: Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the total sum of $6,811,215.00. (bp)

Download PDF
1 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 14 SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.; and ARGES IMAGING, INC., Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT Action Filed: November 10, 2015 v. JIAN LU; ALEXEI HARVARD; LWF TECHNOLOGY LLC; MASHKOV TECH, LLC; AND LENSENSE, INC., 19 Case No. 2:15-cv-08777 RGK (AJWx) Hon. R. Gary Klausner Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-08777 RGK (AJWX) OHSUSA:766135856.1 1 Plaintiff’s Motion for Establishment of Damages and Entry of Judgment 2 came on for hearing on October 16, 2017 in the above-captioned court, the 3 Honorable R. Gary Klausner presiding. 4 Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion and the entire records in this matter, 5 pursuant to this Court’s separate Order filed December 14, 2016 (ECF Dkt. No. 97) 6 granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Jian Lu, and 7 pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby 8 enters final judgment in favor of Plaintiff as follows: 9 10 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: Plaintiff’s Motion is hereby GRANTED in full and judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Sirona and against Defendant Jian Lu as follows: 12 1) Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the total sum of $ 6,811,215.00. 13 2) Post-judgment interest shall accrue at a rate of 10% per annum from 14 15 16 17 the date of entry of this Judgment. 3) Plaintiff is the prevailing party and may recover its costs from Defendant to the extent ordered by the Court. 4) Finding no just reason to delay the entry of this Judgment, the Court 18 hereby directs the entry of this Judgment as a final order pursuant to Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 54. The Court retains jurisdiction over this Judgment for the 20 purpose of ensuring compliance with the terms hereof. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 Dated: October 19, 2017 26 __________________________________ Honorable R. Gary Klausner 27 28 -1OHSUSA:766135856.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-08777 RGK (AJWX)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?