Sharon Josephine Rubin v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 1/4/2017. (im)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 SHARON JOSEPHINE RUBIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. CV 15-8863-PSG (PJW) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 16 17 On November 13, 2015, Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, 18 filed a complaint, challenging a final decision of the Social Security 19 Administration to deny her benefits. 20 issued an order, instructing Plaintiff to serve the Defendant by 21 sending a copy of the summons and complaint by registered or certified 22 mail to the United States Attorney for the Central District of 23 California; the Commissioner for Social Security in Washington, D.C.; 24 and the Attorney General of the United States in Washington, D.C. 25 Plaintiff was instructed to file proof of service of the summons and 26 complaint on the parties listed above with the Court. 27 not done so. 28 On January 8, 2016, the Court Plaintiff has 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, no later than January 4, 2017, 2 Plaintiff shall inform the Court in writing why this case should not 3 be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. 4 timely file a response will result in a recommendation that this case 5 be dismissed. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED 7 Failure to DATED: December 5, 2016 8 9 10 PATRICK J. WALSH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S:\PJW\Cases-Social Security\RUBIN, S 8863\OSC_not dismiss.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?