Sharon Josephine Rubin v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
25
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Carolyn W Colvin against Sharon Josephine Rubin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 24 , it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's reques t for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is DENIED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is GRANTED; (3) judgment is entered in the Commissioner's favor; and (4) the Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
Case No. 2:15-CV-08863 (VEB)
8
9
SHARON JOSEPHINE RUBIN,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
JUDGMENT
NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
13
Defendant.
14
15
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby
16
ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding
17
the case for further proceedings is DENIED; (2) the Commissioner’s request for an
18
order affirming the Commissioner’s final decision and dismissing the action is
19
20
1
JUDGMENT – RUBIN v BERRYHILL 2:15-CV-08863-VEB
1
GRANTED; (3) judgment is entered in the Commissioner’s favor; and (4) the Clerk
2
of the Court shall CLOSE this case.
3
4
5
DATED this 7th day of March, 2018
/s/Victor E. Bianchini
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
JUDGMENT – RUBIN v BERRYHILL 2:15-CV-08863-VEB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?