Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Jonathan Glover et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than October 25, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without prejudice without further warning from the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)

1

O

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

United States District Court
Central District of California

9
10
11
12
13

PHOENIX ENTERTAINMENT
PARTNERS, LLC,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17

Case No. 2:15-CV-09458-ODW(RAO)

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE

H.H.S.S., INC., a California Corporation,
Defendant.

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION

18
19
20
21

On December 8, 2015, Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC, filed a

22

complaint alleging that Defendant H.H.S.S., Inc., infringed on their trademark and

23

engaged in unfair competition. (Compl. 18-20, ECF No. 1.) However, Defendant

24

never filed an answer. Plaintiff has taken no further action to prosecute this case.

25

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no

26

later than October 25, 2016, why the Court should not dismiss this action without

27

prejudice for lack of prosecution. No hearing will be held. Failure to file a timely

28

1

written response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the action without

2

prejudice without further warning from the Court.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

October 13, 2016

6
7
8

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2