Erik Elzy v. Torrance Police Department et al

Filing 17

PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The Court Orders that the terms of the Protective Order Regarding Non-Disclosure of Confidential Information shall govern the handling of such documents produced or disclosed by the parties in this case. 14 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)

Download PDF
2/9/2016 1 G R 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ERIK ELZY, CASE NO. CV15-9559 GW (RAOx) Plaintiff, vs. Hon. George H. Wu Courtroom 10 – Spring St. TORRANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER #18848, OFFICER 18061 and OFFICER #16459 Defendants. Hon. Rozella A. Oliver, Magistrate Judge Courtroom F – Spring St. PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS [Motion for Protective Order; and Declaration of Della Thompson-Bell filed concurrently herewith] 18 Date: February 24, 2016 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: F 19 20 21 Complaint Filed: 12/11/15 Trial Date: Not Set 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants, A. FONTANEZ, G. SANDOVAL, P. YAPELLI and CITY OF TORRANCE’s Motion for Protective Order Regarding Confidential Documents came regularly for hearing on February 24, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Rozella A. Oliver, Magistrate Judge. [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 1 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 After considering the moving, opposing and reply papers and having 2 have heard oral argument, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion for 3 Protective Order Regarding Confidential Documents. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The parties, in the production or disclosure of documents, records, information, or tangible things in this case (hereafter “documents”) may designate certain documents as “Confidential” (collectively herein as “Confidential Documents”). The types of documents which may be designated as Confidential Documents hereunder include: (1) peace officer personnel files and all records which are typically contained within or associated with such peace officer personnel files according to the regular practices of the law enforcement agency which is the custodian of such records – including but not limited to internal affairs investigations and related interviews and reports, peace officer personal financial and asset information, peace officer medical records in the custody of the peace officer’s law enforcement agency employer, records regarding peace officer discipline, associated law enforcement agency employment/internal affairs investigations and related interviews and reports, interviews and reports related to personnel complaints by peace officers and/or citizen complaints against peace officers, and peace officer training records; and (2) comparable records of the parties that may otherwise be privileged from disclosure but which the parties may agree to produce pursuant to the terms of this [Proposed] Protective Order, including a party’s medical records, financial records, or other privileged or confidential records, documents, or information. However, nothing in this [Proposed] Protective Order shall be construed as to require or mandate that any party disclose or produce 27 28 [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 2 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 privileged information or records or other Confidential Documents in this 2 action. 3 2. This [Proposed] Protective Order also requires each party to 4 this action to return the Confidential Documents produced to that party at the 5 conclusion of this lawsuit, subject to certain exceptions specified infra: this 6 requirement is intended to ensure that the use of Confidential Documents is 7 limited to the particular case in which the facts or documents are relevant or 8 at issue. This [Proposed] Protective Order applicable only to the above 9 entitled matter and may not be used in the proceedings of any other matter 10 for the purpose of establishing good cause for a similar stipulation or 11 protective order, nor as a basis for any contention that certain documents or 12 records should or should not be produced in another matter. 13 3. The mechanism by which parties may designate documents as 14 Confidential Documents is either: (a) by marking the individual documents 15 as being “Confidential,” such as on the footer of a specific/individual 16 document, or (b) by enclosing, with the documents such party intends to be 17 treated as Confidential Documents hereunder, written disclosures or 18 discovery responses or correspondence specifically and individually 19 identifying those enclosed documents as “Confidential” such party intends to 20 be treated as Confidential Documents hereunder. The preferred method of 21 designating documents as Confidential Documents is to employ all of the 22 aforementioned means of designation, but such is not required hereunder. 23 4. Documents marked as “Confidential” shall be so marked in a 24 manner that does not obstruct the substance of that document’s text or 25 content. No party shall be permitted to alter or copy a document or record 26 designated as “Confidential” so as to make it appear that such copy of such 27 document or record was not a Confidential Document subject to the terms 28 of this [Proposed] Protective Order; such alteration or copying shall subject [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 3 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 the party or counsel who engages in such action regarding such documents 2 to sanctions, at the discretion of the Court. Nothing in this paragraph shall 3 be construed so as to prohibit transparent “highlighting” of any 4 Confidential Document for emphasis, provided that prior to filing any such 5 “highlighted” document with the Court and/or prior to publishing such 6 “highlighted” document to the finder of fact or jury in this matter, the party 7 adding such “highlighting” emphasis informs the Court or the fact finder, 8 as applicable, that the “highlighting” party has added such “highlighting” 9 emphasis to the document at issue. 10 5. Hereafter, a party who has designated documents as 11 Confidential Documents shall be referred to as the “producing-disclosing 12 party [or counsel]” and the party to whom such documents are produced or 13 disclosed shall be referred to as the “recipient party [or counsel].” 14 6. Confidential Documents shall be used only in preparation for 15 the above entitled action, up to and including the completion of judicial 16 proceedings, as well as any appellate phase of this action, and not for any 17 other purpose, including any other litigation or dispute, and may not be 18 disclosed or disseminated to any other persons, including to any other 19 counsel, other than as set forth in this [Proposed] Protective Order. 20 7. In the event that a recipient party or counsel contends that any 21 Confidential Documents were already in the possession of that party, or that 22 party’s counsel, prior to the date of this Protective Order, or prior to such 23 documents’ production in this matter by the producing-disclosing party, the 24 recipient party or counsel shall have the burden of proving that any such 25 documents were in fact already in the possession of the recipient party or 26 that party’s counsel prior to the date of this Protective Order, or prior to 27 such documents’ production in this matter. 28 [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 4 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 8. 1 The parties shall attempt to resolve any issue regarding 2 such disputed documents or records pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 3 Procedure 37(a)(1) before submitting any such dispute-issue to the 4 Court. 5 9. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and despite any dispute as 6 to whether any documents produced should be subject to the terms of 7 the [Proposed] Protective Order as a result of prior possession, the 8 parties will continue to treat the document(s) at issue as confidential 9 and subject to this Protective Order until the Court rules upon the 10 dispute or until the parties reach agreement on the issue, whichever 11 comes first. 12 10. If, upon review of such a dispute, the Court determines that the 13 disputed Confidential Documents were already in the possession of the 14 recipient party or counsel prior to the date of this [Proposed] Protective 15 Order, or prior to such documents’ production in this matter, those specific 16 documents shall not be subject to the provisions on destruction of copies (¶ 17 24) nor to the provisions on return of documents at the conclusion of 18 litigation (¶ 25), nor shall the recipient party or counsel be prohibited from 19 using those specific documents in other litigation or at trial of this action: 20 otherwise, the remaining provisions of this [Proposed] Protective Order shall 21 continue to apply to such documents as Confidential Documents hereunder. 22 11. The recipient parties to the above entitled action, and/or their 23 counsel, and/or their agents or the agents or employees of their counsel, 24 shall secure and maintain the confidentiality of any and all Confidential 25 Documents in their possession, and shall ensure that such Confidential 26 Documents are used only for the purposes set forth herein below, and for 27 no other purpose, and subject to the terms and provisions of this [Proposed] 28 Protective Order. [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 5 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 12. Nothing in this [Proposed] Protective Order shall be construed 2 so as to prevent the admission of Confidential Documents into evidence at 3 the trial of this matter, or in appellate proceedings on this matter, solely on 4 the basis of the documents’ designation as Confidential Documents. 5 13. Nothing in this [Proposed] Protective Order shall affect any 6 right that any party would otherwise have to object to disclosing or 7 producing any information or documents on any ground not specifically 8 addressed in this Protective Order, including but not limited to objections 9 pursuant to the California Government Code, California Evidence Code, 10 California Penal Code, the Official Records Privilege, the federal Official 11 Information Privilege, the federal Executive Deliberative Process Privilege, 12 the law enforcement-investigative privilege, the attorney-client privilege, 13 the physician-patient privilege, the therapist-patient privilege, the attorney 14 work product protection, the taxpayer privilege, or the right to Privacy 15 under the United States Constitution, the California Constitution or any 16 other applicable state or federal authority (as underscored and/or 17 augmented by the statutory peace officer personnel records privileges 18 pursuant to California Penal Code sections 832.5 through 832.8, as well as 19 California Evidence Code sections 1040 through 1048, and the associated 20 case law), or any other privilege against disclosure or production available 21 under any provision of federal or California law. Nothing in this [Proposed] 22 Protective Order shall be construed as requiring the production or 23 disclosure of documents or information that may be or have been 24 designated as Confidential Documents. Nothing in this [Proposed] 25 Protective Order shall affect any right any party would otherwise have to 26 obtain, acquire, or discover documents or records from any party to the 27 extent permitted under federal or California law, as applicable. 28 [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 6 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 14. Confidential Documents produced in this action shall remain 2 in the sole custody of recipient counsel to whom such documents are 3 produced, who shall be prohibited from releasing or disseminating, to any 4 other persons – including but not limited to legal counsel – any or all such 5 Confidential Documents, except as specifically delineated in this 6 [Proposed] Protective Order. 7 15. All those permitted by a recipient counsel or party to review 8 any Confidential Documents must be informed of the terms of this 9 [Proposed] Protective Order and must agree to abide by such [Proposed] 10 Protective Order before the recipient party or counsel may produce or 11 disclose such documents to such person(s). 12 16. Confidential Documents may be disseminated, released, 13 copied, shared, or otherwise reproduced by a recipient party or counsel 14 only to the following persons: 15 16 17 18 19 (a) counsel for any party to this action who is also a party to this Stipulation; (b) paralegal, stenographic, clerical and/or secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel referred to in paragraph (a); (c) court personnel, including stenographic reporters engaged in such 20 proceedings as are necessary incident to preparation for the trial 21 and pretrial proceedings in the above entitled action; 22 (d) any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this 23 action, and not otherwise employed by either of the parties – 24 provided that such expert or consultant understands and agrees to 25 abide by the terms of this [Proposed] Protective Order; 26 27 (e) any “in-house” or outside experts designated by the defendant(s) to testify at trial in this matter; and/or 28 [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 7 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 (f) any party or witnesses to this action, provided that such party or 2 witness understands and agrees to abide by the terms of this 3 [Proposed] Protective Order. 4 17. Confidential Documents may be submitted in all law and 5 motion proceedings before the Court if done so under seal pursuant to 6 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5.2 and 26 and/or United States District 7 Court, Central District of California Local Rules 79-5.1 and 79-5.2 as 8 applicable and pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph. If any party 9 attaches any Confidential Documents to any pleading, motion, or other 10 paper to be filed, lodged, or otherwise submitted to the Court, that 11 Confidential Document(s) shall be filed/lodged under seal pursuant to 12 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5.2 and 26 and/or United States District 13 Court, Central District of California Local Rules 79-5.1 and 79-5.2 to the 14 extent applicable. However, this paragraph shall not be construed so as to 15 prevent a producing-disclosing party or counsel from submitting, filing, 16 lodging, or publishing any document it has previously designated as a 17 Confidential Document without compliance with this paragraph’s 18 requirement to do so under seal (i.e., a producing-disclosing party or 19 counsel may submit or publish its own Confidential Documents without 20 being in violation of the terms of this [Proposed] Protective Order). 21 18. Furthermore, a recipient party or counsel shall be exempted 22 from the requirements of the foregoing paragraph (¶ 17) as to any 23 specifically identified Confidential Document(s) where the counsel for the 24 producing-disclosing party of such specifically identified Confidential 25 Document(s) serves an express, written waiver as to such specifically 26 identified Confidential Document(s) prior to the submission or publication 27 of the Confidential Document(s) at issue, either upon request by a recipient 28 party or upon the producing-disclosing party’s own initiative. A recipient [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 8 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 party or counsel shall also be exempted from the requirements of such 2 paragraph as to any specifically identified Confidential Document(s) where 3 such Confidential Document(s) is/are not documents, records, or 4 information regarding (1) private, personal information contained in peace 5 officer personnel files (such as social security numbers, driver’s license 6 numbers or comparable personal government identification numbers, 7 residential addresses, compensation or pension or personal property 8 information, credit card numbers or credit information, dates of birth, tax 9 records and information, information related to the identity of an officer’s 10 family members or co-residents, and comparable personal information 11 about the officer or his family); (2) any internal affairs or comparable 12 investigation by any law enforcement agency into alleged officer 13 misconduct; or (3) the medical records or records of psychiatric or 14 psychological treatment of any peace officer or party to this action. The 15 parties shall confer in good faith regarding any request for waiver from this 16 sealing requirement. Prior to submitting in any law and motion 17 proceedings before the Court any Confidential Document(s) exempted 18 from the sealing requirement of this [Proposed] any associated Protective 19 Order, a recipient party or counsel shall confer in good faith with the 20 producing-disclosing party or counsel on the issue of whether the parties 21 can agree on whether such exempted Confidential Document(s) should be 22 filed under seal or whether, if the parties cannot agree, the producing- 23 disclosing party or counsel should move to have such Confidential 24 Document(s) placed under seal by the Court. Additionally, nothing in this 25 paragraph shall be construed to bind the Court so as to limit or prevent the 26 publication of any Confidential Documents to the jury or fact finder, at the 27 time of trial of this matter, where the Court has deemed such Confidential 28 Documents to be admissible into evidence. [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 9 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 19. Nothing in this [Proposed] Protective Order shall be construed 2 as requiring a producing-disclosing party or counsel to waive the 3 requirements hereunder of filing, lodging, or otherwise submitting 4 confidential Documents to the Court only pursuant to the terms of this 5 Protective Order and/or to applicable federal or local rules. 6 20. If, in connection with any deposition taken in this action, 7 counsel questions a witness regarding materials subject to this [Proposed] 8 Protective Order, or use(s) Confidential Documents as deposition exhibits, 9 at the request of opposing counsel or party, the portions of the transcripts of 10 such deposition testimony wherein such materials are discussed, and the 11 applicable attached exhibits, shall be designated as Confidential 12 Documents and shall be subject to the provisions of this [Proposed] 13 Protective Order. However, only deposition exhibits that are designated as 14 Confidential Documents shall be subject to the end-of-litigation return 15 requirement of this [Proposed] Protective Order, infra (¶¶ 24-25); 16 deposition transcripts designated as Confidential Documents shall not be 17 subject to the aforementioned end-of-litigation return requirement of this 18 [Proposed] Protective Order. 19 21. This [Proposed] Protective Order is not intended, and shall not 20 be construed, to prevent current officials or current employees of the City, 21 or Police Department, or Defendant(s), or other authorized government 22 officials, from having access to any document(s) to which such officials or 23 employees would have had access in the normal course of their job duties. 24 22. Confidential Documents shall not be shown, produced, shared, 25 copied to, published, or otherwise disseminated or produced to any person 26 by any recipient party or counsel, or their agents or persons to whom such 27 recipient party or counsel discloses or produces such Confidential 28 Documents, other than as specified in this [Proposed] Protective Order. [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 10 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 23. Confidential Documents shall not be shown, produced, shared, 2 copied to, published, or otherwise disseminated or produced by any 3 recipient party or recipient party’s counsel, or their agents or employees, to 4 any member of the press or news or entertainment media under any 5 circumstances or at any time. 6 24. Electronic copies of any Confidential Documents may be made 7 by any recipient party or counsel but such copies, and their dissemination 8 by any means or medium, shall also be subject to the terms of this 9 [Proposed] Protective Order, and all such copies in the possession of any 10 recipient party or counsel, or their agents, shall be destroyed or permanently 11 deleted at the conclusion of the legal proceedings in the above entitled 12 matter. 13 25. At the conclusion-end of the legal proceedings in the above 14 entitled matter, each person or entity – except court personnel – who has 15 received any Confidential Documents, or any copy thereof, and who is not 16 the producing-disclosing party thereof, shall return all such Confidential 17 Documents to the producing-disclosing counsel within thirty (30) calendar 18 days of the conclusion of such proceedings, or be subject to monetary or 19 other sanctions at the Court’s discretion. No recipient party or counsel may 20 retain any Confidential Documents, or copies thereof, or permit any person 21 or entity to whom the recipient party or counsel provided such document(s) 22 to retain any Confidential Documents, after legal proceedings in the above 23 entitled matter have concluded. 24 26. All counsel in the above entitled action specifically agree not 25 to cause or knowingly permit any disclosure or production of any 26 Confidential Documents, or the contents thereof, except as permitted by the 27 terms of this [Proposed] Protective Order. 28 [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 11 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 27. Any restriction or obligation of this [Proposed] Protective 2 Order that applies to any recipient party likewise applies to any recipient 3 counsel, and vice versa. 4 28. In the event that any party, person, or entity subject to the 5 terms of this [Proposed] Protective Order violates the terms or provisions 6 thereof, in a manner consistent with the requirements of Due Process and 7 the applicable provisions governing motions for sanctions under federal 8 law, including but not limited to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 9 the United States District Court, Central District of California Local Rules, 10 to the extent applicable, at the Court’s discretion, the Court may impose 11 sanctions against the party, person, or entity that the Court finds to have 12 violated of the terms of this [Proposed] Protective Order. However, nothing 13 in this paragraph shall be construed so as to subject counsel for any party in 14 the above entitled action to sanctions for any violation(s) of this [Proposed] 15 Protective Order that are committed by other persons or entities – including 16 but not limited to any agent or employee of any recipient party or counsel or 17 any consultants or experts retained by any recipient party or counsel – 18 provided that, in the event of the filing of a motion for sanctions for 19 violation of the terms of this Protective Order, or within thirty (30) days of 20 the termination of this action (whichever is sooner), recipient counsel files a 21 sworn declaration with this Court affirming that: (a) the alleged violator was 22 informed of all of the applicable terms and provisions of this [Proposed] 23 Protective Order prior to being provided with any Confidential Documents; 24 (b) the alleged violator agreed to abide by the applicable terms and 25 provisions of this [Proposed] Protective Order prior to being provided with 26 any Confidential Documents; and (c) the recipient party and recipient 27 counsel otherwise complied with the end-of-litigation return/destruction 28 provisions of this [Proposed] Protective Order (e.g., ¶¶ 24-25), to the extent [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 12 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS 1 applicable. Nothing in this [Proposed] Protective Order shall be construed 2 as providing for sanctions or the enforcement of any Court orders beyond 3 the powers conferred upon the Court under existing law. 4 29. The provisions of this Protective Order shall be in effect until 5 further Order of the Court or written Stipulation by the parties by and 6 through their attorneys of record. 7 8 IT SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: February 9, 2016 11 __________________________________ 12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Elzy - Proposed Order Protective Order.DOC] 13 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?