Eric Ward v. People of the State of California et al

Filing 25

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 19 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2)Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (ec)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC WARD, 12 Petitioner 13 14 15 Case No. 2:15-cv-09588-RGK (GJS) v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondents. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and all 18 pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and 19 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s 20 Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to 22 which objections have been stated. 23 Nothing in the Objections affects or alters the analysis and conclusions set forth 24 in the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the 25 Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 26 (1) the Petition is DENIED; and 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 DATE: September 19, 2016 __________________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?