Eric Ward v. People of the State of California et al
Filing
25
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 19 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2)Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (ec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERIC WARD,
12
Petitioner
13
14
15
Case No. 2:15-cv-09588-RGK (GJS)
v.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Respondents.
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and all
18
pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and
19
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s
20
Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
21
72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to
22
which objections have been stated.
23
Nothing in the Objections affects or alters the analysis and conclusions set forth
24
in the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the
25
Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
26
(1) the Petition is DENIED; and
27
///
28
///
1
2
(2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
DATE: September 19, 2016
__________________________________
R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?