Dean King v. IM Global et al

Filing 75

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs Complaint in this action is hereby dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice.Plaintiff shall take nothing. Defendants shall have judgment against Plaintiff on all claims, and that Defendants shall recover their costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred herein in an amount to be determined. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

JS-6
1
November 8, 2016

2

VC
P

3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

5
6

DEAN KING,

7

Case No.: 2:15-cv-09646-SJO-AGRx
Plaintiff,

8

vs.

9

IM GLOBAL, INDEPENDENT FILM
PRODUCTIONS LIMITED d/b/a
INDEPENDENT FILM COMPANY,
and LUC ROEG,

10
11

Defendants.

12
13
14

JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES
PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. RULE
56
DATE: November 8, 2016
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
CTRM: 10C – The Honorable
S. James Otero

This Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Summary

15

Adjudication Of Issues of Defendants Independent Film Productions Limited and

16

Luc Roeg (“Defendants”) came on regularly for hearing in the courtroom of the

17

Honorable S. James Otero on October 3, 2016. The Court took the Motion under

18

submission.

19
20
21

After due consideration, and the Court having concluded that there was no
JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. RULE 56
DATE: November 8, 2016
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
CTRM: 10C – The Honorable
S. James Otero
1

1

genuine issue of material fact:

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants’

3

Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff’s Complaint in this

4

action is hereby dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, that Plaintiff shall take

5

nothing, that Defendants shall have judgment against Plaintiff on all claims, and that

6

Defendants shall recover their costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred herein in

7

an amount to be determined.

8
9
10

DATED: November 8, 2016
S. JAMES OTERO, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. RULE 56
DATE: November 8, 2016
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
CTRM: 10C – The Honorable
S. James Otero
2