Tina Reganyan v. Comenity Bank

Filing 14

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter. The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) jointly filed by the parties, finds that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to bear her or its own costs, experts fees, and attorneys fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

1
2
3
4

JS-6

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TINA REGANYAN, an individual,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,
v.
COMENITY BANK,

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-9673-JFW (FFMx)
XXXXXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE
WITH PREJUDICE

14
15
16

Defendants.

Complaint Filed: December 16, 2016
Trial Date:
None
Judge:
Hon. John F. Walter

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE
XXXXXXXXXX

1

The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal pursuant to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) jointly filed by the parties, finds

3

that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. Each party is to

4

bear her or its own costs, experts’ fees, and attorneys’ fees.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

February 22,
Dated: _____________ 2016

Honorable John F. Walters

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1xxxxxxxx
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE