Martin Vogel v. Sym Properties, LLC
Filing
42
JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff as follows: 1. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the sum of twelve thousand dollars and zero cents ($12,000.00), the total statutory damages incurred from Plaintiff's three visits to the property; 2. Defendant shall remove all barriers to access complained of by Plaintiff in his Complaint; 3. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff's reasonable costs of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees, the amounts of which will be determined by this Court via Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
14
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. CV 15-09855-AB (ASx)
Martin Vogel,
v.
Sym Properties, LLC,
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
The following facts are undisputed: Plaintiff Martin Vogel is a T-3 paraplegic,
19
paralyzed from the waist down, who is unable to walk and requires the use of a
20
wheelchair; Defendant Sym Properties LLC owns, operates, or leases the public
21
accommodation at 9202-9218 Alondra Boulevard, Bellflower, CA 90706; Plaintiff
22
visited the public accommodation at least three times; one disabled parking space
23
lacks the required signage and has slopes and/or cross slopes that exceed 2.0%; at
24
least two of the access aisles have slopes and/or cross slopes that exceed 2.0%; and at
25
least one of the access aisles has a level change that exceeds 0.5 inches and lacks
26
flared edges.
27
Based on these facts, this Court finds the following: Plaintiff Martin Vogel is
28
1
1
disabled pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2); Defendant owns, operates, or leases the
2
public accommodation at issue pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iv); the
3
disabled parking space lacks the appropriate signage in violation of the Americans
4
with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (“ADAAG”) § 4.6.4 (1991) and
5
ADAAG § 703.7.2.1 (2010), at least one of the disabled parking spaces has slopes
6
and/or cross slopes that exceed 2.0% in violation of ADAAG § 4.6.6 (1991) and
7
ADAAG § 502.4 (2010), at least two of the access aisles have slopes and/or cross
8
slopes that exceed 2.0% in violation of ADAAG § 4.6.6 (1991) and ADAAG § 502.4
9
(2010), and at least one of the access aisles lacks flared edges in violation of ADAAG
10
§§ 4.3.8, 4.7.5, 4.7.6,4.8.2, 4.8.6 (1991), and ADAAG §§ 303.4, 405.2, 405.3, 406.3,
11
406.5 (2010); and Plaintiff visited the public accommodation at issue on at least three
12
occasions. Because of Plaintiff’s disability and the access barriers he encountered at
13
the subject facility, he was denied full and equal access on each occasion. Under
14
California law, a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act is also a violation of
15
the Unruh Civil Rights Act, which entitles a plaintiff to statutory damages in the
16
amount of $4,000 per offense. Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51, 52.
17
///
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff as follows:
2
3
1. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the sum of twelve thousand dollars and zero
4
cents ($12,000.00), the total statutory damages incurred from Plaintiff’s three visits to
5
the property;
6
7
2. Defendant shall remove all barriers to access complained of by Plaintiff in
his Complaint;
8
3. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff’s reasonable costs of suit and reasonable
9
attorneys’ fees, the amounts of which will be determined by this Court via Plaintiff’s
10
Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: March 8, 2017
15
16
_______________________________________
HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
cc: Fiscal
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?