Bruce Bandel v. United States of America
Filing
40
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Please refer to the Court's order for specifics. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
1
JS 6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
BRUCE BANDEL,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. CV 15-10024-DSF (DFM)
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
Defendant.
15
16
17
On July 31, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss this action. See Dkt.
18
19
37. Because Defendant has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, see
20
Dkt. 21, the Court deemed Plaintiff’s motion to be made under Fed. R. Civ. P.
21
41(a)(2) and accordingly ordered Defendant to file any opposition to an order
22
of dismissal without prejudice within 7 days, see Dkt. 38. On August 22, 2017,
23
Defendant filed a statement of non-opposition and requested that the Court
24
grant Plaintiff’s motion and dismiss this action without prejudice. See Dkt. 39.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
This Court has conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff’s motion and
2
Defendant’s statement of non-opposition. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED
3
and IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be dismissed without
4
prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
5
8/31/17
6
Dated: __________________
______________________________
DALE S. FISCHER
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Presented by:
______________________________
DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?