US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Western Express Inc
Filing
19
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the EEOC's request 18 for voluntary dismissal of its application to enforce its Subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) IS GRANTED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANNA Y. PARK, CA SBN 164242
SUE J. NOH, CA SBN 192134
DEREK W. LI, CA SBN 150122
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
255 E. Temple Street, 4th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Telephone: (213)894-1077
Facsimile: (213)894-1301
E-mail: lado.legal@eeoc.gov
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
14
Petitioner,
15
16
17
18
v.
WESTERN EXPRESS, INC.,
Respondent.
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. 2:15-mc-00055-JFW(ASx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
PETITIONER EEOC’S
REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF ITS
APPLICATION TO SHOW
CAUSE TO ENFORCE ITS
SUBPOENA ON DEFENDANT
WESTERN EXPRESS
24
25
26
27
28
i
Order re: EEOC’S Req. for Dismissal Appl. to Enforce Subpoena
1
On March 10, 2015, Petitioner United States Equal Employment
2
Opportunity Commission (“Petitioner” or “EEOC”) filed its application to enforce
3
its administrative subpoena (Subpoena Duces Tecum LA 14-028 or “Subpoena”)
4
against Respondent Western Express, Inc. (ECF No. 1- 3). Respondent
5
subsequently produced additional documents to respond to the Subpoena. On May
6
29, 2015, the Court held a hearing and ordered Respondent to further comply with
7
the Subpoena by submitting an additional declaration responsive to the Subpoena
8
demands still in dispute. (ECF No. 16). On June 11, 2015, Respondent sent the
9
declaration to the EEOC as ordered by the Court.
10
Because Respondent has subsequently produced responsive documents and
11
has complied with the Court’s Order, the issues raised by the EEOC’s application
12
to enforce its Subpoena against Respondent have been resolved. Pursuant to
13
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the EEOC requests for the voluntary
14
dismissal without prejudice of the EEOC’s subpoena enforcement action.
15
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the EEOC’s request for voluntary
16
dismissal of its application to enforce its Subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of
17
Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) IS GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED that the EEOC’s
18
application to enforce its Subpoena is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
19
20
Dated: ____________________
July 29, 2015
21
22
23
_____________________________
/s/
HON. ALKA SAGAR
United States Magistrate Judge
Submitted by:
24
/s/ Derek W. Li
_______________________
26 Derek W. Li
27 Attorney for Petitioner EEOC
25
28
1
Order re: EEOC’S Req. for Dismissal Appl. to Enforce Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?