Rosa Gabrielian et al v. JPMorgan Chase and Co., et al

Filing 47

JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Assurant, Inc., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,, JPMorgan Chase and Co, Time Insurance Company against Leo Gabrielian, Rosa Gabrielian: Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Time and Chase with res pect to the claims asserted against them by Plaintiffs. For the purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and Civil Local Rules 54-1 through 54-10, Time and Chase are the prevailing parties in this matter and, upon determination of the Clerk of this Court, are entitled to recover appropriate costs as authorized by law. (bm)

Download PDF
1 E-FILED 9/21/16 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ROSA GABRIELIAN, an individual; and LEO GABRIELIAN, an individual; 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., a business 16 entity; JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a business entity; ASSURANT, INC., a 17 corporation; TIME INSURANCE COMPANY, a business entity form 18 unknown, 19 Case No. 2:16-cv-00131-PSG-GJSx [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT Complaint Filed:: October 13, 2015 (Removed from Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC597573) Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 13, 2016, the Court granted the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint filed by Time Insurance Company, d/b/a Assurant Solutions, and the erroneously named Assurant, Inc. (together, “Time”) [Doc. 39], and JP Morgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (together, “Chase”) [Doc. 38]. Order GRANTING Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. 45]. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Time and Chase with respect to the claims asserted against them by Plaintiffs. For the purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and Civil Local Rules 54-1 through 54-10, Time and Chase are the prevailing parties in this matter and, upon Case No. 2:16-cv-00131-PSG-GJSx 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 determination of the Clerk of this Court, are entitled to recover appropriate costs as 2 authorized by law. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 9/21/16 7 Dated: ______________________ By: __________ 8 THE HONORABLE PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:16-cv-00131-PSG-GJSx 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?