Sean Randall v. Merrick Pet Care, Inc. et al
Filing
51
ORDER RE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff and without prejudice as to the class. The dismissal shall be without costs and plaintiff shall retain the rig ht, upon good cause shown within 30 days from the filing date of this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
SEAN RANDALL, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
MERRICK PET CARE, INC., d/b/a
CASTOR AND POLLUX NATURAL
PETWORKS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 16-0139 FMO (ASx)
ORDER RE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
17
The complaint in the above-captioned case contains individual and class allegations, but
18
no answer has been filed and aside from defendants’ filing of a motion to dismiss, no action has
19
been taken in the matter. Now, the court is informed that they have reached a settlement in
20
principle “on a non-class basis” and expect to dismiss the case with prejudice upon execution of
21
the settlement agreement. (See Dkt. 50, Notice of Settlement at 2). The Notice states that the
22
parties “do not believe that their settlement in any way prejudices any potential or proposed class,
23
and have not engaged in any collusive actions.” (Id.).
24
“The claims, issues, or defenses of a certified class may be settled, voluntarily dismissed,
25
or compromised only with the court’s approval.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). Because the putative class
26
has not been certified, the parties need not obtain court approval before dismissing the class
27
allegations without prejudice.
28
1
Having reviewed the case file and determined that no prejudice to the class will result from
2
the dismissal, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with
3
prejudice as to plaintiff and without prejudice as to the class. The dismissal shall be without costs
4
and plaintiff shall retain the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days from the filing date of
5
this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full
6
jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action
7
Dated this 19th day of October, 2016.
8
9
/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?