Jimmy V. Dang v. Fulkerson et al

Filing 57

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. IT IS ADJUDGED that the complaint and action are hereby dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mkr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY V. DANG, 11 CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00222 (SK) Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 JUDGMENT FULKERSON, ET AL. Defendants. 14 15 16 17 Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary 18 19 Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Pleadings to Add Parties; 20 And Denying Plaintiff’s Request for Appointment of Counsel, IT IS 21 ADJUDGED that the complaint and action are hereby dismissed.1 22 23 24 DATED: May 25, 2017 HON. STEVE KIM U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 All parties have consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all proceedings in this case. (ECF Nos. 23, 42). Accordingly, the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge may order entry of judgment in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1); Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1119-21 (9th Cir. 2012). 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?