Jimmy V. Dang v. Fulkerson et al

Filing 57

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. IT IS ADJUDGED that the complaint and action are hereby dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mkr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JIMMY V. DANG,

11

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00222 (SK)

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

JUDGMENT

FULKERSON, ET AL.
Defendants.

14
15
16
17

Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary

18

19 Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Pleadings to Add Parties;
20 And Denying Plaintiff’s Request for Appointment of Counsel, IT IS
21 ADJUDGED that the complaint and action are hereby dismissed.1
22
23
24 DATED: May 25, 2017

HON. STEVE KIM
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

All parties have consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge for all proceedings in this case. (ECF
Nos. 23, 42). Accordingly, the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge may order entry of judgment in this case.
See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1); Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1119-21 (9th Cir. 2012).
1