Jesus Escochea v. The County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
220
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is entered in this action as follows: Plaintiff Jesus Escochea shall have judgment in his favor and against Defendant Ronald Valdivia on his Fourth Amendment claim. Plaintiff Jesus Escochea shall recover 12,500.00, plus attorneys' fees in the amount of $______ and costs in the amount of $______. Defendant the County of Los Angeles shall have judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff Jesus Escochea on his Monell claim. Defendant County of Los Angeles shall recover attorneys fees in the amount of $______ and costs in the amount of $_______ (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) Modified on 8/18/2017 (sr).
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
The County of Los Angeles, )
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
___________________________
Jesus Escochea,
Case No. CV 16-271-JFW (JEMx)
JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2017, Plaintiff Jesus Escochea
18
dismissed his claims alleged in the third, fourth, and fifth
19
causes of action of the First Amended Complaint for tort in
20
se and negligence against Defendants Ronald Valdivia and the
21
County of Los Angeles, and the Court bifurcated the Monell
22
claim alleged against Defendant the County of Los Angeles in
23
the second cause of action of the First Amended Complaint;
24
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2017, pursuant to a Stipulation
25
for Dismissal with Prejudice between Plaintiff Jesus Escochea
26
and Defendants the City of Hawthorne and Keith Kauffman, the
27
Court entered an Order dismissing Plaintiff Jesus Escochea’s
28
entire action against Defendants the City of Hawthorne and
Keith Kauffman;
1
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2017, pursuant to a Stipulation Re
2
Plaintiff’s Claim Based Upon a Violation of the First
3
Amendment, the Court entered an Order dismissing Plaintiff
4
Jesus Escochea’s claim for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
5
based upon an alleged violation of the First Amendment
6
alleged in the first cause of action of the First Amended
7
Complaint against Defendant Ronald Valdivia;
8
WHEREAS, the sole remaining claim against Defendant
9
Ronald Valdivia for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based upon
10
an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment alleged in the
11
first cause of action of the First Amended Complaint came on
12
for a jury trial on April 4, 2017;
13
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2017, the jury returned a verdict in
14
favor of Plaintiff Jesus Escochea on his claim for violation
15
of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based upon an alleged violation of the
16
Fourth Amendment and against Defendant Ronald Valdivia; and
17
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2017, the Court granted summary
18
judgment in favor of Defendant the County of Los Angeles on
19
Plaintiff Jesus Escochea's claim for Monell liability under
20
42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleged in the second cause of action of the
21
First Amended Complaint;
22
IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
23
DECREED that judgment is entered in this action as follows:
24
1.
Plaintiff Jesus Escochea shall have judgment in his
25
favor and against Defendant Ronald Valdivia on his Fourth
26
Amendment claim.
27
28
2
1
2.
Plaintiff Jesus Escochea shall recover $12,500.00,
2
plus attorneys’ fees in the amount of $__________ and costs
3
in the amount of $_______________.
4
3.
Defendant the County of Los Angeles shall have
5
judgment in its favor and against Plaintiff Jesus Escochea on
6
his Monell claim.
7
4.
Defendant County of Los Angeles shall recover
8
attorneys’ fees in the amount of $__________ and costs in the
9
amount of $______________.
10
11
The Clerk is ordered to enter this Judgment.
12
13
14
Dated: June 6, 2017
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?