Luanne Danielle Dunning v. Carolyn W Colvin
Filing
32
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini, in favor of Luanne Danielle Dunning against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 31 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing this action is DENIED; (3) jud gment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision and Order 31 ; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (wr)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
Case No. 2:16-CV-00352 (VEB)
LUANNE DANIELLE DUNNING,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
JUDGMENT
NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
12
13
Defendant.
14
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order, it is hereby
15
DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff’s request for an order remanding this case for further
16
proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED; (2) the
17
Commissioner’s request for an order affirming the Commissioner’s final decision
18
and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff’s favor
19
and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Decision
20
1
JUDGMENT – DUNNING v BERRYHILL 2:16-CV-00352-VEB
1
and Order; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for
2
attorneys’ fees and costs.
3
4
5
DATED this 9th day of May, 2017,
/s/Victor E. Bianchini
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
JUDGMENT – DUNNING v BERRYHILL 2:16-CV-00352-VEB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?