Harmoni International Spice, Inc. et al v. Wenxuan Bai et al

Filing 202

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the FRCP in favor of the Dismissed Defendants on Plaintiffs' RICO Sub-section 1962(c) and (d) claims. (jp)

NO JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17

HARMONI INTERNATIONAL SPICE,
INC., a California corporation, and
ZHENGZHOU HARMONI SPICE CO.,
LTD., a corporation,
Plaintiffs,

Case No. 2:16-cv-00614-BRO-ASx
Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell
JUDGMENT

v.

18

WENXUAN BAI, an individual et al.,

19

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
1

JUDGMENT

1
2

The Court previously issued Orders dismissing with prejudice Plaintiffs Harmoni

3

International Spice, Inc. and Zhengzhou Harmoni Spice Co., Ltd.’s (collectively,

4

“Plaintiffs”) RICO §§ 1962(c) and (d) claims against Defendants Robert T. Hume

5

(“Hume”), Joey C. Montoya (“Montoya”), Stanley Crawford (“Crawford”), Huamei

6

Consulting Co., Inc. (“Huamei”), Kwo Lee, Inc. (“Kwo Lee”), Shuzhang Li (“Li”); C

7

Agriculture Group Corp. (“C Agriculture”); Jin Xia Wen (“Wen”); and Mingju Xu

8

(“Xu”) (collectively, the “Dismissed Defendants”). ECF Nos. 121, 163.

9

Under Rule 54(b), a district court may enter a final judgment “as to one or more,

10

but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is

11

no just reason for delay.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Having considered the standard for

12

entry of judgment under Rule 54(b), the Court finds that it is appropriate to enter

13

judgment under Rule 54(b) as to the Dismissed Defendants on Plaintiffs’ RICO §§

14

1962(c) and (d) claims.

15

Thus, for the reasons set forth above and in the Court’s Order re Plaintiffs’

16

Motion for Entry of a Final Judgment dated June 12, 2017, ECF No. 200, IT IS

17

HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that FINAL JUDGMENT is

18

hereby entered pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in favor

19

of the Dismissed Defendants on Plaintiffs’ RICO §§ 1962(c) and (d) claims.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 26, 2017

21
22
23
24

By:
Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell
United States District Court Judge

25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
2