Isidro Barajas v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER ALLOWING ADDITIONAL TIME TO FINALIZE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:On December 8, 2016, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement in this case. The following day, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause allowing the parties thirty-days to finalize their settlement agreement. The thirty-day period expired on January 9, 2017. (Id.) The parties have still not finalized their settlement agreement and request an additional sixty days to do so. The Court will GRANT them this additional time to finalize their settlementagreement. The Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing,by March 10, 2017, why settlement has not been finalized. (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

ISIDRO BARAJAS,

Case № 2:16-cv-00754-ODW(RAO)

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

ORDER ALLOWING ADDITIONAL

14

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.; and DOES

15

1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17
18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

TIME TO FINALIZE SETTLEMENT

1

On December 8, 2016, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement in this case.

2

(ECF No. 16.) The following day, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause allowing

3

the parties thirty-days to finalize their settlement agreement. (ECF No. 18.) The

4

thirty-day period expired on January 9, 2017. (Id.) The parties have still not finalized

5

their settlement agreement and request an additional sixty days to do so. (ECF Nos.

6

19–20.) The Court will GRANT them this additional time to finalize their settlement

7

agreement. The Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing,

8

by March 10, 2017, why settlement has not been finalized.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

January 10, 2017

12
13
14
15

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2