Marie Frances Hingada v. Axis Specialty U.S. Services, Inc. et al

Filing 36

JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Marie Francis Hingada take nothing, that this action be dismissed with prejudice on the merits and that defendant recover its costs Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 34 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

1
2

AUG 3 ~ 2016

3
4
5
6

pr~~rity ~

~ ~

Send
~,~~tet ~
~~osed ~~
lJS-6~
~
~:
JS ~~nly~~"
Scan

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARIE FRANCIS HINGADA,

CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-00832 SVW (SPx)

Plaintiff,

[A~~ssi ned for all p~u~rposes to:
Hon.~tephen V. Wilson, Courtroom 6]

12
vs.

13
14

AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES,INC.

[

OSED]JUDGMENT

and DOES 1 to 10,
15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
2
0

This action came before the Court, Hon. Stephen V. Wilson Presiding, on the

21

motion of Defendant AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES,INC.("Defendant") for

22

summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment("Motion") with the

23

evidence presented having been fully considered and a decision having been duly

24

rendered in granting Defendant's Motion.

25

/ //

26

/ //

27

///

28

/ //
j [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

CASE NO.2:16-cv-00832 SVW (SPxI

1

THEREFORE,IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff

2 Marie Francis Hingada take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice on the
3

merits and that Defendant recover its costs.

4
i _.

5
6

DATE:

~~~/~
HON. EVEN V. WILS N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
0
21
22
23
2
4
25
26
27
28
2 [PROPOSED]JUDGMENT

CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00832 SVW (SPxI