Joe Maldonado v. Kim Holland
Filing
68
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that: (1) Petitioner's motion for discovery and motion for appointment of counsel are denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying and dismissing the First Amended Petition with prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendation) (sp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
JOE MALDONADO,
) NO. CV 16-998-FMO(E)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
v.
)
)
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
KIM HOLLAND, Warden,
)
)
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
)
Respondent.
)
______________________________)
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the
19
First Amended Petition, all of the records herein and the attached
20
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
21
Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions
22
of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been
23
made.
24
Recommendation.
The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner’s motion for discovery and
27
motion for appointment of counsel are denied; and (2) Judgment shall
28
be entered denying and dismissing the First Amended Petition with
1
prejudice.
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order,
4
the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Judgment
5
herein on Petitioner and on counsel for Respondent.
6
7
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
8
9
DATED: October 31, 2017.
10
11
12
13
/s/
___________________________________
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?