Lolita Sigua v. Aegis Wholesale Corporation et al

Filing 13

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. On May 18, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause 12 why this Plaint iff's claims against AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than June 1, 2016. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LOLITA SIGUA 10 11 12 13 Case No. CV 16-01036-AB (SSx) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY v. AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41) 16 17 On May 18, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this Plaintiff’s 18 claims against AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH 19 LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY should not be dismissed for lack 20 of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be 21 filed no later than June 1, 2016. No response having been filed to the Court’s Order to 22 Show Cause, 23 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, 24 without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of 25 the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. 26 27 28 Dated: June 6, 2016 _______________________________________ ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?