Lolita Sigua v. Aegis Wholesale Corporation et al
Filing
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. On May 18, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause 12 why this Plaint iff's claims against AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than June 1, 2016. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
LOLITA SIGUA
10
11
12
13
Case No. CV 16-01036-AB (SSx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AS TO AEGIS
WHOLESALE CORPORATION;
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE;
AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY
v.
AEGIS WHOLESALE
CORPORATION, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
(PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)
16
17
On May 18, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this Plaintiff’s
18
claims against AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION; COMMONWEALTH
19
LAND TITLE; AND RECONSTRUST COMPANY should not be dismissed for lack
20
of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be
21
filed no later than June 1, 2016. No response having been filed to the Court’s Order to
22
Show Cause,
23
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed,
24
without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of
25
the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.
26
27
28
Dated: June 6, 2016
_______________________________________
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?