Lavell Frierson v. Eric Arnold

Filing 7

JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson:For the reasons set forth in the Order Denying and Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Petitioner Lavell Friersons Petition for Writ for Habeas Corpus, filed on February 18, 2016 is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Further, because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court on its own motion declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Further, because Petitioner has been perseverative in his efforts to have the federal courts reconsider claims, arguments, and facts long ago resolved in his case, though the Court has sought to explain to him why he is without the right or ability to do so, the Court orders that Petitioner be subject to the Pre-Filing Review. This order constitutes final disposition of the petition by the Court.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

18

) Case No.: CV 16-1139 DDP
)
) JUDGMENT
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ERIC ARNOLD, Warden, California )
)
)
State Prison at San Quentin,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
For the reasons set forth in the Order Denying and Dismissing Petition for

19

Writ of Habeas Corpus, Petitioner Lavell Frierson’s Petition for Writ for Habeas

20

Corpus, filed on February 18, 2016 is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.

21

Further, because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

22

constitutional right, the Court on its own motion declines to issue a certificate of

23

appealability.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

24

LAVELL FRIERSON,

Further, because Petitioner has been perseverative in his efforts to have the

25

federal courts reconsider claims, arguments, and facts long ago resolved in his

26

case, though the Court has sought to explain to him why he is without the right or

27

ability to do so, the Court orders that Petitioner be subject to the Pre-Filing Review

28

Judgment

1

Order issued simultaneously with this Judgment and the Order Denying and

2

Dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus .

3

This order constitutes final disposition of the petition by the Court.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 1st day of February 2017

7
8

_____________________________

9
10
11

DEAN D. PREGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Judgment