Unicolors Inc v. Topson Downs of California Inc et al

Filing 30

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu: FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice; 2. Each party will bear its own costs and fees as incurred in connection with this action; and 3. This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement that precipitates this dismissal. SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cr)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314) stephen@donigerlawfirm.com Scott A. Burroughs (SBN 235718) scott@donigerlawfirm.com Trevor W. Barrett (SBN 287174) tbarrett@donigerlawfirm.com DONIGER / BURROUGHS 603 Rose Avenue Venice, CA 90291 Telephone: (310) 590-1820 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 UNICOLORS, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. Case No.: CV 16-1181-GW(ASx) Honorable George H. Wu Presiding ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE TOPSON DOWNS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California Corporation, individually, and d/b/a “LOVE FIRE CLOTHING”; et al., Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 – [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE ORDER: 1 2 3 FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 1. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice; 5 2. Each party will bear its own costs and fees as incurred in 6 7 8 9 connection with this action; and 3. This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement that precipitates this dismissal. SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 DATED: June 1, 2016 By: ________________________ GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 – [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?