Unicolors Inc v. Topson Downs of California Inc et al
Filing
30
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu: FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice; 2. Each party will bear its own costs and fees as incurred in connection with this action; and 3. This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement that precipitates this dismissal. SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cr)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314)
stephen@donigerlawfirm.com
Scott A. Burroughs (SBN 235718)
scott@donigerlawfirm.com
Trevor W. Barrett (SBN 287174)
tbarrett@donigerlawfirm.com
DONIGER / BURROUGHS
603 Rose Avenue
Venice, CA 90291
Telephone: (310) 590-1820
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
UNICOLORS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
v.
Case No.: CV 16-1181-GW(ASx)
Honorable George H. Wu Presiding
ORDER ON STIPULATION
TO DISMISS ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
TOPSON DOWNS OF CALIFORNIA,
INC., a California Corporation,
individually, and d/b/a “LOVE FIRE
CLOTHING”; et al.,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 – [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ORDER:
1
2
3
FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY
ORDERED:
4
1.
This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice;
5
2.
Each party will bear its own costs and fees as incurred in
6
7
8
9
connection with this action; and
3.
This Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the
settlement agreement that precipitates this dismissal.
SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
DATED: June 1, 2016
By: ________________________
GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 – [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?